Careful, the MSM will start calling you a birther...
It could be proven beyond a doubt he was born in Kenya and his worshippers would say “It doesn’t matter.”
Plus, they’d bring up the McCain “vote” in the senate that established that McCain is “natural born”. And that’s why McCain and his rino buddies had that vote to begin with....make obama eligible. The senate decided they had the authority to decide who’s eligible to run for president.
And about 40% of the population doesn’t give a rip anyway.
Bogus survey already posted here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2692017/posts
You have to be REALLY gullible to believe this. Blacks are 12% of the population. This would require 25% of black to have problems with Obama’s eligibility, and 100% of every other ethnic group.
Here are some examples of the poll questions this pollster asks:
Recent polls suggest a significant percentage of Americans question Obamas own constitutional eligibility for office as a natural born citizen. Please tell me if you agree or disagree with the following statements on the matter: We dont know enough about Obamas birthplace, parentage and his residency in Indonesia to say for sure.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=159317
President Obama has still not produced a long-form birth certificate that proves he was born inside the United States. Knowing this, do you consider him to be a legitimate president?
Read more: Just 51% of Americans believe Obama eligible http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=122525#ixzz1HFKdwSLG
Thinking about his performance in office and his agenda for the country, and knowing about the ongoing questions about his birth certificate, are you more or less likely to believe in his legitimacy as president?
Read more: Just 51% of Americans believe Obama eligible http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=122525#ixzz1HFKn80yz
Are you aware of questions raised about Barack Obamas constitutional eligibility for the office of president?
What is your view of lingering questions about Obamas eligibility to be president?
President Obama has refused to release his educational records, which could prove or disprove whether or not he was born in the United States as required by the Constitution. What is your opinion of the fact Obama has not released his educational records?
Read more: Only 9% believe Obama has documented eligibility http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=276865#ixzz1HFL3riIB
If yall believe these are unbiased polls, then you are gullible enough to believe anything.
71 posted on Monday, March 21, 2011 8:07:52 AM by Mr Rogers
Today’s forecast, it’s gonna be raining trolls on this thread!
I can believe that the vast majority know that Obama hasn’t proved it...otherwise there would be no ongoing controversy. That doesn’t mean they think he’s ineligible.
This should send Chris Matthews into a tizzy: “9 out of 10 Americans is a birther” LOL.
Chris Matthews will ignore the overall poll results and just focus on the sample of Republicans and ask his liberal guests from Huffington Post and The Nation to explain the Republican bigotry(for the 100th time on his show.) .
Maybe some states will pass some eligibility laws for 2012.
The very strange part is.....no one can find anyone who grew up with or knew Obama when he was younger.
My little granddaughter needed to have an ID picture taken so she could run track in her district playground. My daughter had to bring HER ID, as well as my granddaughter’s birth certificate. After standing in a long line, she was told that she had brought the incorrect copy of the BC. The one she brought was the hospital certificate. She needed the one issued by the state. She was, of course, frustrated. I told her she should have told them, “If the President of the U.S. doesn’t have to show his BC, then my daughter shouldn’t need one to run track!”
ping
Some of the data from Question #1:
Guess the attempt to ignore this issue hasn't worked out in favor of the state run media and the politicians. Too bad for them.
******
Just wondering: What legal document does a presidential candidate in a state, like New Hampshire, have to attach to his application form to show proof that he is eligible to run for president under the laws of the Constitution?
That is, can a presidential candidate get away without attaching NO legal document at all like, say, an OFFICIAL document from a candidate's birth state with the state's SEAL on it?
For instance, if an unknown person like me wants to run for president on the Noname Party primary ballot, do I simply fill out and sign the application form without having to attach any legal document that I was born in the United States and that I meet the age requirement?
Do the election officials in New Hampshire simply take my word for it that I am who I say I am on my presidential application form I fill out in order to enter the primary?
If true, it scares me that anybody can run for president in New Hampshire without providing any OFFICIAL state documents that he was born in the United States, that he is the right age, and that he was not adopted by a citizen in a foreign country at some point in his life.
If I don't provide a long form birth certificate, how does New Hampshire election officials prove that I am NOT lying on my application form if they have doubts and suspicion that I was NOT born in the United States and that I do not meet the age requirement?
How about this idea: Republican presidential candidates VOLUNTARILY attach their long form birth certificates to their application forms in order to reassure the public that they have nothing to hide about their births and that they are who they say they are?
I bet state election officials would be thrilled to see a long form birth certificate attached to a presidential candidate's application form even though the candidates are not required to do so under state law.
As I see it, a state law can tell a presidential candidate that he is not required to attach a long form birth certificate to his application form, but there is no state law that keeps a candidate from VOLUNTARILY attaching a long form birth certificate to his application if he wants to.
Furthermore, that constitutional amendment could require candidates for vice president, U. S. Senator, and U. S. Representative to prove their (respective) constitutional qualifications as well.
And that 9% that believe it are all Democrats at the bottom of the IQ chart. Probably AFL CIO members too.
There are so many potential scenarios that may have been pre-designed by others just to get us off on a dozen or so trails none of which will become fruitful.
DNA will decide in the end who the Dear Leader is,other than that its all speculation.