Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tutstar

That’s an unconstitutional establishment of religion.


4 posted on 03/19/2011 9:17:36 AM PDT by Keith in Iowa (FR Class of 1998 | TV News is an oxymoron. | MSNBC = Moonbats Spouting Nothing But Crap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Keith in Iowa

“That’s an unconstitutional establishment of religion.”

This story doesn’t involve religion, it involves Islam and Sharia. Your comment makes no sense.


8 posted on 03/19/2011 9:20:45 AM PDT by BobL (PLEASE READ: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2657811/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Keith in Iowa

Dontcha think?


9 posted on 03/19/2011 9:20:45 AM PDT by tutstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: tutstar

Just another Black Robed Mullah on the bench.


15 posted on 03/19/2011 9:24:16 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Keith in Iowa

Precisely. The judge should be removed from the bench and the order rescinded.


19 posted on 03/19/2011 9:28:28 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Keith in Iowa
"That’s an unconstitutional establishment of religion."

No, it's not. It's a judge enforcing a binding contract, an arbitration contract in this case.

There is a legal principle in contract law called "choice of law". Essentially, it allows for parties to establish what law will apply to the contract that they've executed. It can be a binding arbitration contract, a sales contract, a marriage contract, really any number of contracts have choice of law provisions in them.

For example, many wildly rich people will stipulate in their prenuptial agreements that a certain state's laws will apply in the divorce, irrespective of where the parties actually file for divorce. So, in a community property state like California, it wouldn't at all be unusual for a prenuptial agreement to specify that a more favorable state's domestic law would apply, like Florida's for example.

Virtually every international business contract that is executed in the US today, has one or several choice of law provisions in it; Maybe they're applying German law, or French law and sometimes when doing business with a Middleastern country, there is a sharia law provision. It happens.

It is NOT "sharia law invading the US".

24 posted on 03/19/2011 9:37:16 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Keith in Iowa

Of course it is. Judge needs to be impeached. Don’t local and state judges swear to uphold the US Constitution?


28 posted on 03/19/2011 9:46:17 AM PDT by dools0007world
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Keith in Iowa
That’s an unconstitutional establishment of religion.

That should be a no-brainer, but one never knows with the U.S. Supreme Court (where I believe this case will go if higher Florida courts don't reverse this decision).

56 posted on 03/19/2011 10:14:50 AM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Keith in Iowa
No , Islam is a form of government disguised as a religion. My question is , is the judge registered as a foreign agent? if not then he is committing treason by representing the interests of a foreign government that is hostile to the interest of the U.S.
79 posted on 03/19/2011 1:22:37 PM PDT by omegadawn (qualified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson