1 posted on
03/18/2011 6:55:07 PM PDT by
redreno
To: redreno
To: 2nd amendment mama; myboyz; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; ...
3 posted on
03/18/2011 7:00:45 PM PDT by
redreno
(Americans don't go Gault. Americans go Postal.)
To: redreno
4 posted on
03/18/2011 7:01:36 PM PDT by
mylife
(Opinions: $1.00 ~ Halfbaked: 50c)
To: devolve; ntnychik; PhilDragoo; dixiechick2000; MeekOneGOP
5 posted on
03/18/2011 7:03:34 PM PDT by
potlatch
( ~*coincidences usually aren't *~)
To: redreno
Righthaven needs to be made to stop this frivolous BS.
What they are suing for is not CW infringement. Its them trying to pop small fish and earn a fast $5,000 here and there in settlements. Nothing more....
Just like the music folks suing parents over their kids sharing 5, 10 20 songs... demanding millions then settling for $1,000 a song payable to them in monthly installments, its BS.
Now if the LA Times is reposting their articles without credit that’s different, but bloggers and even posting here on FR it should be understood its not CW infringement. Also as a source link is posted with it, like here at FR.
To: redreno
These folks needs to be sued into bankruptcy.
(Litigious Bastards)
7 posted on
03/18/2011 7:07:52 PM PDT by
Paladin2
To: redreno
9 posted on
03/18/2011 7:23:05 PM PDT by
jazusamo
(His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
To: redreno
Pauperize and jail Righthaven.
10 posted on
03/18/2011 7:26:54 PM PDT by
Navy Patriot
(Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
To: redreno
Another nail in the coffin.
12 posted on
03/18/2011 7:29:00 PM PDT by
snowrip
(Liberal? You are a socialist idiot with no rational argument.)
To: redreno
Predator lawyers lose! Yea!
13 posted on
03/18/2011 8:03:08 PM PDT by
Mister Da
(The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
To: redreno; All
Yes good news...lets hope now that websites and blogs do not back down to Righthaven anymore...since they are now losing legal rulings
Most courts and judges around the country do not like it when a case is brought to court, and no attempt to remedy the issue out of court has been made. Righthaven had better wise up
16 posted on
03/18/2011 8:31:31 PM PDT by
UCFRoadWarrior
(Will Japan blame America for its latest nuking?)
To: redreno
Now sue them into the dirt for legal fees and damages.
21 posted on
03/18/2011 9:11:35 PM PDT by
Caipirabob
( Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: redreno
Does everyone get a refund?
22 posted on
03/18/2011 9:12:30 PM PDT by
fatima
(Free Hugs Today :))
To: redreno
Somebody needs to take them all out on a RICO violation - extortion, obstruction of justice, fraud to name a few:
Under RICO, a person who is a member of an enterprise that has committed any two of 35 crimes—27 federal crimes and 8 state crimes—within a 10-year period can be charged with racketeering. Those found guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $25,000 and sentenced to 20 years in prison per racketeering count. In addition, the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business gained through a pattern of "racketeering activity." RICO also permits a private individual harmed by the actions of such an enterprise to file a civil suit; if successful, the individual can collect treble damages.
24 posted on
03/18/2011 10:58:52 PM PDT by
brityank
(The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
To: redreno
"Righthaven loses..."YES!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson