She's not President yet -- but when she is, the Palin doctrine will be the same as the Reagan doctrine: "We win, they lose."
Cheers!
By that criteria, every single one of us on Free Republic can claim a Doctrine. The difference is that many of us on Free Republic can articulate just HOW Obama messes up. By contrast, look at Sarah Palin's answer regarding Egypt. She could not articulate either her own position (she did not seem to have one) or articulate Obama's position. When asked to specifically explain HOW Obama handled it wrong and HOW she would have handled it it differently, she was totally lost and spent a lot of words saying absolutely nothing.
She's not President yet -- but when she is, the Palin doctrine will be the same as the Reagan doctrine: "We win, they lose."
I voted for Ronald Reagan twice. I spent the entire Reagan Administration on active duty in the U.S. Navy.
Sarah Palin is no Ronald Reagan.
Ronald Reagan:
Sarah Palin:
In order to accomplish the Reagan doctrine: "We win, they lose" in 2008, a minimum requirement was to have a clue who this guy was.
If the 1980 Reagan had been alive in 2008 and running for President, he could have told you everything there was to know about Sayyid Muqtadā al-Ṣadr and then some.
By contrast, Sarah Palin had absolutely no clue who was killing Americans in Iraq in 2008 even though her own son was headed to that war zone.
That is the difference between Ronald Reagan and Sarah Palin.