Skip to comments.
Bill O’Reilly’s Panel: Sarah Palin’s Poll Numbers Down Because She’s ‘Overexposed’
Mediaite ^
| 3/16/11
| Alex Alvarez
Posted on 03/16/2011 9:24:44 PM PDT by pissant
On The Factor this evening, host Bill OReilly brought on a panel to discuss Fox News contributor Sarah Palins falling poll numbers.
The Polling Company founder and president Kellyanne Conway suggested Palins increased visibility and celebrity status may be partially to blame for the falling numbers. In a word: Overexposure.
Fox News contributor Tammy Bruce, meanwhile, was more interested in how those poll numbers might change once Palin is given an unfiltered platform for espousing her political beliefs insinuating, of course, that Americans have yet to truly hear Palins opinions or her take on political issues.
(Excerpt) Read more at mediaite.com ...
TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: billoreilly; bor; dailykosposter; oreilly; overexposed; palin; palinwest2012; pissedant4dailykos; tammybruce
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: UCFRoadWarrior
I had her pegged the minute she opened her trap about amnesty.
21
posted on
03/16/2011 11:03:55 PM PDT
by
pissant
((Bachmann 2012 - Freepmail to get on/off PING list))
To: pissant
Well, be listening on the 19th.
22
posted on
03/16/2011 11:13:20 PM PDT
by
RobbyS
(Pray with the suffering souls.)
To: UCFRoadWarrior
Not conservative to tax Big Oil? They own Murkowski.
23
posted on
03/16/2011 11:15:53 PM PDT
by
RobbyS
(Pray with the suffering souls.)
To: pissant
Bill OReillys Panel: Sarah Palins Poll Numbers Down Because Shes Overexposed They're idiots. Sarah Palin is always tastefully dressed.
24
posted on
03/16/2011 11:20:45 PM PDT
by
upsdriver
(to undo the damage the "intellectual elites" have done. . . . . Sarah Palin for President!)
To: AlexW
Did you read the rest of my post? He didn’t mean that Palin or BHO are emotional themselves, he was trying to say (albeit poorly) that they affect most people emotionally, i.e. to either love ‘em or hate ‘em.
25
posted on
03/16/2011 11:53:31 PM PDT
by
llandres
(Forget the "New America" - restore the original one!!!)
To: Prokopton; AlexW
“There was no Palin bashing. BOR stated that people were emotional about Palin. For or against, this is certainly true.”
Thank you, that was what I was trying to clarify in my previous posts, but you did it better! :-)
26
posted on
03/16/2011 11:56:37 PM PDT
by
llandres
(Forget the "New America" - restore the original one!!!)
To: pissant
So, now you are pushing Ted Baxter’s opinion.
You line up with Politico, Ted Baxter, even probably the NY Times if they have something negative to say about Palin.
Real objective of you Pissant.
To: SoConPubbie
28
posted on
03/17/2011 12:05:07 AM PDT
by
pissant
((Bachmann 2012 - Freepmail to get on/off PING list))
To: pissant
Gee, what a surprise, Pissant once again posts another anti-Sarah article. Another BS hit piece.
29
posted on
03/17/2011 12:18:29 AM PDT
by
calex59
To: bergmeid
He was talking about us, the public, Palin lovers and Palin haters.
30
posted on
03/17/2011 12:49:17 AM PDT
by
StayoutdaBushesWay
(Every man dies, but not every man really lives.)
To: UCFRoadWarrior; pissant
You forgot embracing homos.........
To: pissant
Who do you want to listen to and watch for the next eight years: 1. Barack Hussein Obama 2. Joe Biden 3. Hillary Rodham Clinton 4. William Jefferson Clinton 5. Mike Huckabee 6. Ron Paul 7. Herman Cain 8. Willard Romney 9. Newt Gingrich or
10. Sarah Palin
32
posted on
03/17/2011 1:06:56 AM PDT
by
namvolunteer
(We draw the Congressional districts this time)
To: pissant
Talk about over exposed,you couldn’t walk into a mall,bookstore,or grocery store a couple of years ago without it looking like an Obama shrine.It was an embarrassment.I mean his mug was everywhere.So this argument isn’t gonna fly,BORe.
To: Uncle Meat
Talk about over exposed,you couldnt walk into a mall,bookstore,or grocery store a couple of years ago without it looking like an Obama shrine.It was an embarrassment.I mean his mug was everywhere.So this argument isnt gonna fly,BORe.
Except for the fact that Obama WAS overexposed and his expectations (having risen to the "walk on water" level) were way to high. It's amazing, here in DC, how many stores that loaded up on Obama merchandise for the inauguration STILL have that merchandise sitting on the shelfs ... at VERY deep discount. Socking that much $$$ into Obama-related inventory drove at least three businesses that I know of out of business (market economy applies regardless of whether you think the guy you're investing in is the messiah or not, d*mba**es) and is causing serious problems for a third (used to be my favorite area newsstand - they've cut their inventory way way down, but have an entire area of Obama-cr*p at deep discount that they can't get rid of).
In politics there's the possibility that a candidate will "peak too early", and the rules apply across the board. Obama was very fortunate that he peaked at just the right moments. But history is replete with candidates who peaked early, burned out and lost. It's better to try to engineer peaking at the best possible moment to leave it to chance ... and I see a definitely possibility that Palin and her team are driving towards a VERY early peaking followed by the set in of significant candidate-fatigue.
To: TheZMan
BOR, how appropriate, he is a bore. Does anyone really care what this numnuts has to say about anything? It’s laughable that he even has an audience, must be full of masochists.
35
posted on
03/17/2011 3:56:06 AM PDT
by
VeeP22
To: pissant
No, “FWIW” means your now trying to cover your relentless and weird Palin obsession and hate with a dishonest passive-aggressive “this is kinda interesting” act.
Everyone sees through it.
Get.
Help.
You’re getting scary.
36
posted on
03/17/2011 5:01:00 AM PDT
by
Carl LaFong
(Experts say experts should be ignored.)
To: Carl LaFong
pissant is now ‘nobody by that name’ — not s suspension.
37
posted on
03/17/2011 9:44:59 PM PDT
by
Lucius Cornelius Sulla
(Liberty and Union, Now and Forever, One and Inseparable -- Daniel Webster)
To: TheZMan
I love it yesterday when Levin referred to bill o'reilly, AKA: 'The leprechaun' as "the FOX 8:00 o'clock guy". Mark was talking about how O'Reilly is such a kiss-up to Obama in hopes of getting more appearances on his show where he can kiss Obama's ass some more and generate more money for himself. But I guess those two Irish guys Obama and O'reilly stick together.
38
posted on
03/23/2011 7:52:59 AM PDT
by
KeyLargo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson