You know, if you'd bothered to actually post some facts to back up your original assertion, we wouldn't be having this little conversation.
Sitting there having a coniption over the fact that I'm simply refusing to just swallow your statement as gospel, just proves that you were talking out of your azz to begin with, and have NOTHING to back up what you said.
You said that Obama has a 60% chance of being re-elected. I'm asking you to explain how you know this, or by what process of logic you've arrived at this conclusion.
Where are your facts? Share the data, if you have it. That's all I asked from the outset, but you immediately got your back up and told me I had a problem with reading. I read what you posted just fine - now how 'bout you back up your alleged "mathematical probabilities"?
I assert that Obama doesn't have anything close to a 60% chance of being re-elected. His low approval numbers (-20 today, per Rasmussen) support that. There's an actual fact for you.
Lastly, if you can't have your statements challenged without exploding in a hissy fit, then your skin is too thin to be posting here. Your last little rant was a real tantrum.