Actually sir your statement is factually incorrect. It has been proven that Obama is NOT a natural born citizen. This is due to the FACT his dad was not a citizen, which BTW is a requirement.
Could you point us to where that is written in the Constitution? No? How about in a decision of the Supreme Court? No? How about in the US Code of Laws, the law of the land? No?
Has the current Supreme Court ruled Obama to be ineligible due to his parentage in any of the 13 Obama eligibility appeals that have reached the High Court? Berg v Obama? Beverly v FEC? Craig v US? Donofrio v Wells? Herbert v Obama? Hollister v Soetoro I? Hollister v Soetoro II? Kerchner v Obama? Lightfoot v Bowen? Rhodes v MacDonald? Schneller v Cortes? Taitz v Obama? Wrotnowski v Bysiewicz?
“Based on the language of Article II, Section I, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “Natural Born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”—Indiana Court of Appeals, Ankeny et. al. v The Governor of Indiana, Mitch Daniels, November 12, 2009.