Replies

Actually sir your statement is factually incorrect. It has been proven that Obama is NOT a natural born citizen. This is due to the FACT his dad was not a citizen, which BTW is a requirement.

Could you point us to where that is written in the Constitution? No? How about in a decision of the Supreme Court? No? How about in the US Code of Laws, the law of the land? No?
Has the current Supreme Court ruled Obama to be ineligible due to his parentage in any of the 13 Obama eligibility appeals that have reached the High Court? Berg v Obama? Beverly v FEC? Craig v US? Donofrio v Wells? Herbert v Obama? Hollister v Soetoro I? Hollister v Soetoro II? Kerchner v Obama? Lightfoot v Bowen? Rhodes v MacDonald? Schneller v Cortes? Taitz v Obama? Wrotnowski v Bysiewicz?

“Based on the language of Article II, Section I, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “Natural Born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”—Indiana Court of Appeals, Ankeny et. al. v The Governor of Indiana, Mitch Daniels, November 12, 2009.

_________________________________________________________________________

The lies continue.

The old Indiana lie. The judge with the circular logic to then issue a simple formal ruling - AFFIRMED was the total ruling. His puke the preceded was not a ruling. To imply otherwise is sick lie. WKA is THE most conversational ruling in SCOTUS history anyway. This Hoosier judge got his marching order and followed them. Put vomit down on paper to be used in forums like this and convince the masses that do not read legal brief that some actual law was made. Well, this ain’t *hitcago.

And - its ‘natural born Citizen’ not ‘Natural Born Citizen’. Abusing and misusing the term in the Constitution shows either a lack of understanding or lack of respect or both.

‘natural Citizen’ follows the father lineage.
‘born Citizen’ is a Citizen (note the capital C is used correctly) FROM BIRTH. When combined - ‘natural born Citizen’ is someone whose father was a Citizen (Obama’s was not) and who has been a Citizen from birth (Obama has not since he was an Indonesian citizen as a child).

Hence why Schatz and Hawaii Democratic Party NEVER declared Obama an Article II eligible candidate. NEVER. Schatz committed fraud and attempted to commit fraud and Pelosi baled him out with the CEO.

But Schatz did not want to commit the crime of declaring a knowingly ineligible candidate a valid one. That fraud - he did avoid.

So quote a hick judge from Hoosierville. But go find out why Schatz would not put his John Hancock on the OCON in Hawaii. When you have that answer - come tell us. Inside guy.