Ronald Reagan would not have allowed this to happen.
Sickening.
Hmm... I wonder how N Korea may be interpreting all of this "carry a BIG stick... but follow up with nothing" policy?
Just what is it Ronald Reagan wouldn’t allow? The leader of a country could only be expected to keep rebels from over taking the country and killing him. Just who is it that you think we should back in a Hamas organized rebellion?
I don’t have a horse in this race but I perfectly understand why Gaddafi would want to destroy those that are trying to kill him.
Gaddafi has been peaceful for the last 30 years I don’t know who I should feel sorry for but I don’t think a Hamas led revolt would do the united States any good.
It will all be over soon. Gaddafi and his sons will have one of the few “relatively” stable governments left in the Middle East. The people left alive in his country will know better than to mess with him. It’s a shame the leadership in Egypt didn’t have enough sense to do the same thing as Gaddafi.
There will likely be a number of European leaders and the US who will be sorry for their pro rebellion comments. I expect Gaddafi to punish them someway.
Abraham Lincoln had United States soldiers do much the same as Ghadaffi. Do the names Vicksburg or Atlanta ring any bells? They weren’t the only ones.
This is a civil war. They suck. That doesn’t mean we should involve ourselves.
If it gets the Italian’s and the Frenchmen’s panties in a bunch, let them handle it. It is no concern of ours.
Oh please. If this country keeps listening to the likes of you on foreign intervention, we'll be involved in every bush war, backwater battle and border skirmish on the planet until we turn into a backwater ourselves through insolvency and exhaustion.