Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

http://www.nraila.org/pdfs/obamaletter314.pdf

ABC gave a bum html link. It crashed my computer twice. This will open in a new window.

1 posted on 03/16/2011 2:46:38 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

Good one from the NRA, and the truth!


2 posted on 03/16/2011 2:50:30 PM PDT by Inyo-Mono (Had God not driven man from the Garden of Eden the Sierra Club surely would have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Obama just wants to ban private sales of firearms, and prevent them being entrusted to heirs. There is no 2nd Amendment anymore if that occurs.


3 posted on 03/16/2011 2:51:16 PM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Any politician who holds that the state accords rights is an oathbreaker and an "enemy... domestic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Well now...

The NRA, and Wayne, are doing good this week. Nice to see.

7 posted on 03/16/2011 3:09:34 PM PDT by OKSooner (Obama confessed "his muslim faith" on the George Stephanopolous show on September 7th, 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
King Obama will write an executive order banning all ownership of guns. And the police will support and enforce it.
9 posted on 03/16/2011 3:19:16 PM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
The O-bot would be delighted to fix that mental health system... as long as he gets to define gun ownership as a mental disorder.
10 posted on 03/16/2011 3:24:09 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Thanks, good letter by the NRA.

Guns are like government. They both can cause great harm in the wrong hands.

Those who argue that the despite the Constitution evil guns should not be in the hands of ordinary citizens, can be expected to soon argue the same about government.


11 posted on 03/16/2011 3:27:39 PM PDT by frog in a pot (We need a working definition of "domestic enemies" if the oath of office is to have meaning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; Delacon; ...

Obama sucks. Thanks neverdem.


13 posted on 03/16/2011 3:58:19 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Munz

ping


14 posted on 03/16/2011 4:34:17 PM PDT by B4Ranch (Do NOT remain seated until this ride comes to a full and complete stop! We're going the wrong way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem; gieriscm

When is Zero going to push for these kinds of background checks for voting? I see no reason that a 4473 style application and NICS background check shouldn’t be done for voting.

It would eliminate voters voting more than once, it would keep anyone ineligible from voting, and it would put a stop to most types of vote fraud out there.

It’s a common sense approach to a very dangerous problem that undermines the Constitution and the Rights of the people to be secure in their choices to vote. Only someone who would want voter fraud would be against such a background check when someone wants to vote. A few minutes of inconvenience is worth the security that we’ll have knowing our voting system is protected.

After all, if it’s good enough for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, it’s good enough for the Right to Vote... Right?


17 posted on 03/16/2011 6:42:27 PM PDT by BCR #226 (07/02 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
...he said that since the tragic shooting in Tucson perhaps another 2,000 Americans have been lost to gun violence.

Then again, perhaps not.

18 posted on 03/16/2011 6:44:08 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; Jeff Head; ...
Happy Saint Patrick's Day!

Stand Up to Bullies of the NRA

Mexico lawmakers livid over US 'Operation Fast and Furious'

There Aren’t Enough Millionaires - The rich can’t fund our deficits.

Lessons From the Battle of Madison

Some noteworthy articles about politics, foreign or military affairs, IMHO, FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.

22 posted on 03/17/2011 6:43:29 AM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Obama isn’t interested in taking violent criminals off the streets - they are a core part of his constituency.


23 posted on 03/17/2011 7:12:04 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; nunya bidness; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; wku man; SLB; ...
Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!
24 posted on 03/17/2011 7:19:58 AM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
There's a reason elite liberals don't want to follow common sense recommendations like those offered by the NRA.

It's because the reasons liberal elites give for wanting gun control are lies. The NRA is responding to liberal elites as if they were telling the truth. They aren't. It's why the NRA's message isn't working. Liberal elites wouldn't let that message work if God handed it to them on gold tablets.

26 posted on 03/17/2011 7:36:18 AM PDT by GOPJ (http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.php - It's only uncivil when someone on the right does it.- Laz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
gilbo_3 to nra..."Shall NOT be infringed" is a no compromise statement...

what 'law enforcement' does that allow beyond keeping predators and nutjobs locked up until they are simply no longer predators or nuts ???

27 posted on 03/17/2011 8:01:59 AM PDT by Gilbo_3 (Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force.Like fire,a dangerous servant & master. George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
"contact every U.S. Attorney and ask them to bring at least 10 cases per month against drug dealers, gang members and other violent felons caught illegally possessing firearms. By prosecuting these criminals in federal court – rather than state court – strong sentencing guidelines would apply and charges would not be plea-bargained or dismissed, nor would criminals be released after serving only a fraction of their sentences. This simple directive would result in roughly 12,000 violent criminals being taken off the streets every year";

Oh-oh! LaPierre stepped in 'it', big time.

He's telling Eric Holder to put "His People" (Holder is Amish ya know) in Federal Prison.
That's downright racist! (/s)

'Series' this has been a major problem in Chicago and Crook County for over a decade. On (unofficial) orders from 'King' Richie Daley the Crook County States Attorney has refused to turn over to the Feds ANY of these reprobate maggots for prosecution in Federal Court. And why would Daley and the Crook County States Attorney do that? Because these reprobate maggots have relatives that vote. Yep, it's that simple -- VOTES!

And as a result of that SICK thinking, a few months ago TWO Chicago LEOS were executed in broad daylight by a maggot (Amish) who was out on Bail for ----- Attempted Murder and to boot, out on Parole for Burglary. Yeah, you're right, he never should have been out on the streets due to his Parole Violation.

One LEO was a veteran Chicago Cop taking fingerprints of a garage break-in and car burglary. The other LEO was an ex-CHA Policeman who was the Home and Car owner. Both were armed but never had a chance to even go for their weapons. Both were shot in the back of the head.

It's 'Gun Violence' like this that falls directly back on the shoulders of Daley, the Democratic Party, and their policy of coddling and pandering to DANGEROUS FELONS and minorities for ... VOTES! And in every 'urban area' in the USA this scenario plays out every day. Democrat mayors and their Party hand picking Democrat 'judges' (and parole board members) whose only concern is ... VOTES!

So 20,000 more 'common sense gun control' laws would NOT have prevented this assassination of two good people. BUT! 20,000 new 'politicians' who care about VIOLENT CRIMINAL CONTROL might have. Then again, the current Democrat Pols who run these urban cesspools could enforce the laws already on the books. No matter 'whose people' they may turn out to be.

But that policy might be a little too radical. Relatives would get mad and not vote for them again.

28 posted on 03/17/2011 8:10:43 AM PDT by Condor51 (Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a Congressman. But I repeat myself. [Mark Twain])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson