Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sefarkas

Supposedly there’s a substantial amount of Plutonium in reactor #3, is that not true? They were using it to recycle nuclear weapons so the claim is.


34 posted on 03/14/2011 7:50:14 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: DB
Supposedly ...

Sorry, I thought I was being clear. Unit #3 was loaded with MOX fuel. The non-zero amount of Pu that MOX fuel starts with is either from retired weapons, or Pu extracted from spent fuel at the Japanese reprocessing facility. In any event, it is typical and normal for light-water-reactors to burn Pu during a fuel cycle. It is easier to fission Pu than U235 in the context of it takes less mass of Pu to create a critical (self-sustaining fission reaction) as compared to a self-sustaining Uranium process. In both cases, control rods with boron in them stop the fission reaction. The decay heat production rate is nearly the same with MOX fuel bundles and their Uranium cousins -- which is why they can be used in a commercial reactor without having to modify the reactor system.
42 posted on 03/14/2011 8:00:29 PM PDT by sefarkas (Why vote Democrat Lite?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson