Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP conservatives balk at stopgap spending bill
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 3/14/11

Posted on 03/14/2011 12:42:03 PM PDT by SmithL

One of the top conservatives in the House is opposing a measure to keep the government running for three more weeks while the White House and Republican lawmakers seek a longer-term agreement on spending cuts.

Republican Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio chairs a group of conservative lawmakers . . .

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: budget; continuingresolution; jimjordan; taxandspend; yourtaxdollarsatwork
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 03/14/2011 12:42:06 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

The latest stopgap spending bill includes funding for Planned Parenthood and directly pays for abortions in D.C.

This alone should be enough to block this bill. Neither of those recipients are “urgent needs”, regardless of one’s views on abortion.


2 posted on 03/14/2011 12:44:27 PM PDT by TheBattman (They exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

The GOP needs to signal that it plans to vote “No” on increasing the debt ceilling unless the Dims agree to at least the original $100 billion in cuts the GOP outlined. They wont’ but the should.


3 posted on 03/14/2011 12:44:36 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

“The latest stopgap spending bill includes funding for Planned Parenthood and directly pays for abortions in D.C.”

It also allows more funding for Obamacare. What is it about national bankruptcy that the Republican “leadership” does not understand? We are literally on the precipice of an economic meltdown and stopgap funding bills are being authorized to kick the can down the road.


4 posted on 03/14/2011 12:50:37 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
I'd consider doing ONE more CR, but flatly stating NO MORE.

This one would allow a final round of negotiations.

5 posted on 03/14/2011 12:55:28 PM PDT by Lazamataz (NPR is the ACORN of the media world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

STOP THE JOHN BOEHNER/ BARACK OBAMA DEATH TO AMERICA HEALTHCARE BILL!

GET THE $105,500,000,000 BACK !!!!


6 posted on 03/14/2011 1:00:59 PM PDT by TsonicTsunami08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

Send the Republican “Leadership” to Japan. Especially the Three Amigos ...I mean Young Guns.


7 posted on 03/14/2011 1:01:52 PM PDT by screaminsunshine (34 States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TsonicTsunami08

Does it cover whimpering attacks? Bonehead seems to suffer from this malady.


8 posted on 03/14/2011 1:03:05 PM PDT by screaminsunshine (34 States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
RETOOL
9 posted on 03/14/2011 1:05:16 PM PDT by FrankR (The Evil Are Powerless If The Good Are Unafraid! - R. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

“This one would allow a final round of negotiations.”

It is unlikely that one more round will change a thing. Dems are just stalling; they’ve already negotiated the “cut” down to $61 billion, a miniscule and meaningless reduction to what is a truely horrific budget problem. Republicans need to draw a line in the sand, but I won’t hold my breath.


10 posted on 03/14/2011 1:12:34 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

“I’d consider doing ONE more CR, but flatly stating NO MORE.”

Politicians have been saying that since the beginning of time.

Only a fool would fall for it again


11 posted on 03/14/2011 1:18:28 PM PDT by wilco200 (11/4/08 - The Day America Jumped the Shark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Starboard
I'd say this three-week-but-no-more could be that line in the sand.

The problem is, they didn't say that last time, and you really shouldn't blindside people.

12 posted on 03/14/2011 1:27:01 PM PDT by Lazamataz (NPR is the ACORN of the media world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wilco200

Kick the ball charlie brown, I promise I will not move it this time. Sure!!!!!


13 posted on 03/14/2011 1:33:02 PM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

“you really shouldn’t blindside people”

I agree with you as a general principle however, considering what the Dems did to us in the lame duck session, a payback is in order. Just like in boxing, if you get aggressively hit below the belt, you respond with a low blow (or late hit) yourself. Dems have not played fair and they need to learn to respect the opposition otherwise they’ll just keep bullying us.


14 posted on 03/14/2011 1:35:47 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Starboard
I agree with you as a general principle however, considering what the Dems did to us in the lame duck session, a payback is in order. Just like in boxing, if you get aggressively hit below the belt, you respond with a low blow (or late hit) yourself. Dems have not played fair and they need to learn to respect the opposition otherwise they’ll just keep bullying us.

I hear ya about payback, but sometimes I really do wonder if God gives an advantage to those who don't engage in the most base behavior -- even in return.

15 posted on 03/14/2011 1:38:29 PM PDT by Lazamataz (NPR is the ACORN of the media world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: code 10 militia
If they blow this,

Well, it depends on what the meaning of "this" is.

17 posted on 03/14/2011 2:01:54 PM PDT by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist savages, in honor of Standing Wolf.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Sometimes its hard to turn the other cheek. :)
Regards.


18 posted on 03/14/2011 2:02:03 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
According to Levin, a vote for the CR is a vote to continue funding Obamacare.

The rats controlled the entire government last year and purposely did not pass a budget. It was a twofer. They denied a target for conservative opponents. Leadership also knew the Obamacare funding would likely continue in any CR absent a budget. It was brilliant in a Machiavellian sense. The people were sure to kick out the rats, but the new House would face serious problems repealing or even defunding the crown jewel of tyrants, National Socialist Healthcare.

Oh, as for funding without specific appropriations, think Social Security and Congressional pay raises. Both are on autopilot like Obamacare.

19 posted on 03/14/2011 2:19:19 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Limit the franchise to those with a positive stake in our system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
This alone should be enough to block this bill. Neither of those recipients are “urgent needs”, regardless of one’s views on abortion.

While Abortion is not the issue I would pick to say this gets defunded or else the government shuts down (I would prefer CPB). The GOP needs to pick one program and eliminate it in the CR, and go one program per 2 week CR. If the issue chosen is abortion so be it. But what ever program is chosen it must be a leftist supporting program and your talking point is that we voted to fund the government, but the Dems voted to shut down the gov. instead of cutting X.
Repubs also need to understand that if the program they chose survives on any level of government support they have failed. By going this route they have gone to zero sum (if dems win they lose).

20 posted on 03/14/2011 2:34:18 PM PDT by Fraxinus (My opinion, worth what you paid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson