Skip to comments.
Issa: White House Helped Draw Up Net Neutrality Rules
expose obama ^
| 3/13/11
| Brooks Boliek, Politico
Posted on 03/13/2011 5:18:51 PM PDT by Nachum
FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski is denying a charge that White House officials improperly influenced the commissions net neutrality rules.
In a November 2009 letter to Genachowski, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) said media reports suggest that Obama administration officials had knowledge of and potentially contributed to [the] crafting of the controversial net neutrality rules.
Specifically, Issa noted that a 2009 American Spectator article said a draft of the net neutrality rules had been circulated to Obama administration officials and that Genachowski and President Barack Obama made suspiciously similar remarks about the rules on Sept. 21, 2009.
Issa then the ranking member, now the chairman of the House Oversight Committee asked, among other things, whether then-White House economic adviser Larry Summers had had any contact with the FCC about net neutrality.
When Issa received no response to his letter, he wrote again on Dec. 29, 2010. His letters and a response from Genachowski were released by the FCC on Thursday.
In his response, Genachowski said that the Communications Act of 1934 does not prohibit communications between commissioners and commission staff and members of the administration.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: baker; clyburn; fcc; genachowski; helped; house; issa; mcdowell; netneutrality; white
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
1
posted on
03/13/2011 5:18:59 PM PDT
by
Nachum
To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...
2
posted on
03/13/2011 5:19:39 PM PDT
by
Nachum
(The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
To: Nachum
NO NO a thousand times NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Net neutrality is a filthy liberal commie LIE
Fight it!
3
posted on
03/13/2011 5:19:54 PM PDT
by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: Nachum
4
posted on
03/13/2011 5:22:54 PM PDT
by
tutstar
To: LucyT; BP2; rxsid; null and void; Candor7
5
posted on
03/13/2011 5:23:55 PM PDT
by
tutstar
To: Nachum
Count me surprised.....NOT!!!!!!!!!
6
posted on
03/13/2011 5:24:26 PM PDT
by
SumProVita
(Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
To: yldstrk
Fight it!
########
I agree. I’ve been arguing against Net Neutrality right from the get-go.
But ... Why is this particular issue such a big deal?
To: Nachum
Am I missing a larger issue here? I don’t see how the WH crafting this turd is any suprise. The FCC is in Obummers back pocket. I don’t see the criminality with this collusion.
8
posted on
03/13/2011 5:30:02 PM PDT
by
Lazlo in PA
(Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
To: Nachum
Isn't the FCC an independent commission?
Summary The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is an independent Federal agency with its five members appointed by the President, subject to confirmation by the Senate. It was established by the Communications Act of 1934 (1934 Act) and is charged with regulating interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite, and cable. The mission of the FCC is to ensure that the American people have availableat reasonable cost and without discriminationrapid, efficient, nation- and world-wide
Ref: http://www.ipmall.info/hosted_resources/crs/RL32589_091027.pdf
And the President is ordering it what to do? ADD THIS TO THE LIST OF REASONS TO IMPEACH - NOW NOW NOW TODAY.
9
posted on
03/13/2011 5:32:25 PM PDT
by
Cheerio
(Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
To: Nachum
Just what oversight is Issa actually acting on???
10
posted on
03/13/2011 5:32:34 PM PDT
by
maggief
To: InterceptPoint
Because it will make getting the truth impossible, don’t you see? Already no one trusts the MSM, we have to go to the internet to get differing perspectives.
11
posted on
03/13/2011 5:33:09 PM PDT
by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: Cheerio
“independent” federal agency? Have you lost your ever lovin’ mind? Who do you think gets appointed to run it? Bambi’s best friend of course. We are talking control of the message here. IT IS A HUGE DEAL!
12
posted on
03/13/2011 5:34:32 PM PDT
by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: Nachum
The Commie Lawyers will destroy us.
To: yldstrk
independent federal agency? Have you lost your ever lovin mind? Who do you think gets appointed to run it?
The FCC is directed by five commissioners appointed by the U.S. president and confirmed by the U.S. Senate for five-year terms, except when filling an unexpired term.
So how is that Barry has control of it, only being in office 2+ years?
14
posted on
03/13/2011 5:49:43 PM PDT
by
Cheerio
(Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
To: yldstrk
I meant White House involvement. So what?
Bad policy from the FCC or bad policy from the White House. Looks all the same to me.
To: yldstrk
Because it will make getting the truth impossible, dont you see?Exactly. It's all about silencing conservatives, and all dissenting opinion. The left can't control things as long as the truth can come out. And believe me, they want control over the people.
16
posted on
03/13/2011 6:11:16 PM PDT
by
meyer
(We will not sit down and shut up.)
To: Nachum
Obama has his filthy hand in every crap pie being baked in Washington.
17
posted on
03/13/2011 6:13:28 PM PDT
by
Venturer
To: Nachum
18
posted on
03/13/2011 7:06:52 PM PDT
by
Foolsgold
(L I B Lacking in Brains)
To: Nachum
I am shocked. SHOCKED, I say.
19
posted on
03/13/2011 7:07:16 PM PDT
by
PENANCE
To: Nachum
What I see in this, Obama in collusion with the FCC is confirmation of an agenda.
I believe that agenda would be silencing, or impairing participation of Conservative perspectives on issues.
It would be typical of the Obama MO. In search of that obstacle free ride to the mythical pot of Leftist gold we are all paying so dearly for.
20
posted on
03/13/2011 7:07:25 PM PDT
by
rockinqsranch
(Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson