Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah

That still seems to me like a substantial alteration. It’s not like he was selling copies of the pic. No one would look at the photo and the poster and consider them to be the same thing.


13 posted on 03/12/2011 4:50:19 AM PST by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye

I don’t remember Nordstrom’s selling Bush shirts yet they sold Obama ‘Hope’ shirts. Won’t shop there anymore.


14 posted on 03/12/2011 4:52:15 AM PST by WaterBoard ("PBR Street Gang this is Almighty, over..")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: TigersEye
That still seems to me like a substantial alteration. It’s not like he was selling copies of the pic. No one would look at the photo and the poster and consider them to be the same thing.

There is such a thing as a "derivative" work. This clearly falls into that category. Anyone looking at the two can clearly see that one is based on the other. A derivative work is covered by copyright law.

16 posted on 03/12/2011 4:52:51 AM PST by paulycy (Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson