“You do not create Copper from Nickel without a nuclear reaction.”
Go give him your money then....lol
If you know anything about elements, you would know you can change one into another even with a nuclear reaction. It is easier to build the element out of sub-atomic particles.
Soooo scammmed, what is wrong, I am trying to educate you guys to how the con works and you feel insulted, actually that is a very normal reaction.
No one wants to feel like they been had.
We have seen people that will still give up their money even after every person they meet told them it was a scam, it just made them madder and madder and they actually doubled down. Human beings are wonderful creatures.
Look, no con is going to work very long, 3 months is actually a long time. He isn’t going to wait that long, he will let this run as long as possible then poof, gone.
Could be 1 more day, this might have been the grand final already. Or he may able to run this out two months.
Sources please. I think you got this from Star Trek - this has not been done anywhere, at any time. We cannot even make Hydrogen. How do you manipulate a sub-atomic partical (quarks?)
The reason this is getting so much scruitiny, is because many physists are looking at what he has published - and are scratching their heads. To much fact to be utter non-sense; but this doesn't fit the Nuclear models we have today.
That's why we have the CERN Supercollider. We are essentially trying to figure out how a watch works, by hitting it with a hammer and looking at the pieces.
The fact is that we do not fully understand what holds atoms together, how they work, or what makes them up. Our models have lots of holes in them. Quantum Mechanics is not a very solid science - we only have scratched the surface.