Have you ever looked around the PESwiki? Your source is familiar to me, I have gone to it for years. Take a look around, they have a lot of questionable science there. In fact, I think that is where I heard of ENECO and the rechargable aluminum battery.
Ok ... let’s throw out the PESC source.
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Andrea_A._Rossi_Cold_Fusion_Generator
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-01-italian-scientists-cold-fusion-video.html
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=465187
It’s getting critical reviews. Part of the problem that I see, is that the reaction that is taking place does not conform to established Nuclear models. And the Professors are reluctant to share too much of what they are doing until the patents are established.
The patent group wants to understand what is going on - and at this point no one is really sure what is happening, other than the observable results.
If you made this, how much info would you share? Share to much - and someone steals your idea. Not enough, and you are called a fraud. Frankly, I don’t care if it uses a ‘Sky-hook’; as long as it works and generates reliable, cheap and consistent power at a low cost - without harmful waste products - I can live with some mysteries in my life.