Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wis. Senate approves bill to strip public employees of collective bargaining rights (18-1)
Twitter Breaking News ^ | March 09, 2011

Posted on 03/09/2011 4:34:05 PM PST by library user

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-272 next last
To: library user

We reminded them how to do just this over a week ago.

Congrats!


21 posted on 03/09/2011 4:39:14 PM PST by ataDude (Its like 1933, mixed with the Carter 70s, plus the books 1984 and Animal Farm, all at the same time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HeartlandOfAmerica

No they don’t. They had a quorum, which is half plus one. Only for fiscal bills did they need a larger quorum.


22 posted on 03/09/2011 4:39:39 PM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: HeartlandOfAmerica
Ummmm. Don’t the R’s need 19 to get the collective bargaining measure to pass?

Not sure. Stand by. Maybe there was a loophole.

23 posted on 03/09/2011 4:39:46 PM PST by library user (Just because you're homeless doesn't mean you're lazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: library user

WOW! I can’t believe they had the guts to do this. I hope they are prepared for the union anger to come. I was looking at some sites that are union friendly and they are VERY angry. The police are union supporters as well. Who is going to protect these brave lawmakers? I am going to do some major praying for their safety.


24 posted on 03/09/2011 4:40:21 PM PST by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: library user

Just saw it on Fox News’ Special Report Online Show!! :)

I think the WI House needs to pass the same collective bargaining bustin’ bill tomorrow, so expect histrionics on the part of the Left, attempts to block entry into the House chamber, bodies going limp, screaming, Hitler comparisons, etc.

But it’s basically over, and we won!


25 posted on 03/09/2011 4:40:24 PM PST by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HeartlandOfAmerica
The R's took all the budget language out of the bill and left in all the collective barganing language (that the Dems so hated) in....then passed it!

Woo-Hoo!

26 posted on 03/09/2011 4:40:55 PM PST by CAluvdubya (Don't retreat...reload!.....and no, I'm not changing my tagline! Pray for Sarah and her family)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Robe
Per fox.. The missing Dems are rushing back to Madison at this time

Cool. Seize them as they arrive in WI, chain them to the Senate floor, and then pass the original bill.

27 posted on 03/09/2011 4:41:00 PM PST by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HeartlandOfAmerica

No... they needed a quorum of 20 to pass financial bills. This stripped all financial/budgetary portions.


28 posted on 03/09/2011 4:41:00 PM PST by ataDude (Its like 1933, mixed with the Carter 70s, plus the books 1984 and Animal Farm, all at the same time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: HeartlandOfAmerica

“Ummmm. Don’t the R’s need 19 to get the collective bargaining measure to pass?”

It’s 20, but only on financials. That’s why this was stripped out. And now the bill cannot be modified, only voted up or down.

Question now is, will the RATS return and what will be the save face move?


29 posted on 03/09/2011 4:41:42 PM PST by EQAndyBuzz (The way to beat a terrorist is to terrorize him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: library user

They took out the fiscal part of the bill which means they don’t need the 20 senators to hold a vote.


30 posted on 03/09/2011 4:42:12 PM PST by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: HeartlandOfAmerica

They stripped the financial stuff out and passed the union busting bill by itself.


31 posted on 03/09/2011 4:42:12 PM PST by sportutegrl (I plan on watching it today or tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: HeartlandOfAmerica

“Don’t the R’s need 19 to get the collective bargaining measure to pass?”

Not on the non-fiscal bills. My understanding is that they rewrote the collective bargaining into a new stand-alone bill and this changed the dynamics of the game.


32 posted on 03/09/2011 4:42:30 PM PST by rj45mis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: library user

THEY’RE NOT RIGHTS~

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRGH!!!!!!!


33 posted on 03/09/2011 4:42:35 PM PST by scfirewall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: library user

So am I to understand that the missing dems seats were considered vacant?

That meant the vote could go forward.


34 posted on 03/09/2011 4:42:45 PM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: library user

Americans will save this country yet! To hell with the commie ‘RATS. We love our country and will not let them destroy it!


35 posted on 03/09/2011 4:43:08 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Just say NO to union greed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: library user

Geez, it’s gonna look like a Bay City Rollers concert up there tomorrow.


36 posted on 03/09/2011 4:43:17 PM PST by Crawdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: library user

All items deemed non-fiscal cut. All other items left in. There is a rumor that some fleebagers will return soon... in which case, the fiscal items will be added back. Either way, passed and signed WI will become a right to work state.


37 posted on 03/09/2011 4:43:42 PM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: library user

I wish they would have passed it 12-7 or something. “Too bad you weren’t there, Democrats, you could have defeated the bill.”


38 posted on 03/09/2011 4:43:50 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crawdad

Yep...heh heh heh


39 posted on 03/09/2011 4:43:53 PM PST by CAluvdubya (Don't retreat...reload!.....and no, I'm not changing my tagline! Pray for Sarah and her family)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Thank you for moving thread back into breaking.

I screwed up on the date, though. I put 2001 instead of 2011.


40 posted on 03/09/2011 4:43:53 PM PST by library user (Just because you're homeless doesn't mean you're lazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-272 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson