Fantastic!
I never suggested anything about local law enforcement.
Of course that which we don’t understand sometimes seems silly and pointless.
Look, you suggested it would be wise to study this guy. For the life of me, I can’t see a reason for it unless it was to gain a way to prevent further crimes like this. If that wouldn’t be the end game here, what possible relevance does an interview deductive process and the mention of a forensic television show have to do with this topic?
Some crimes you can’t prevent. You are left with conviction and sentencing.
No, you didn’t mention local law enforcement. You merely mentioned what 7 plus 3 would equate to, and I made what you think is a stupid determination, by thinking we were both talking about 10.
Look, if we’re going to talk about what seems silly and pointless, let’s just accept that so far you have understood nothing that pertains to this case.
I find that less than fantastic.