[John D]

Because she was probably guilty of reckless endangerment.

Because she was PROBABLY guilty? Do you mean you think a person should be allowed to hit a 14 year old girl in the face four times just because they were PROBABLY guilty of something. I can not find one thing she did that was wrong. She was skiing, she turned to avoid another skier who fell and ran into a kid who was also skiing. Don't you think the father had a responsibility to watch his own kid?

[ml/nj]

Don't you think the father had a responsibility to watch his own kid?

My interpretation of what I read is that that is exactly what he was doing.

ML/NJ