Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Dems Answer House GOP on Spending Cuts, Reid Predicts Bills Will Fail
Fox News ^ | 3/4/2011 | Trish Turner

Posted on 03/04/2011 2:24:38 PM PST by tobyhill

In the face of Republican calls for Democrats to offer a plan of their own for funding the federal government, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid unveiled a $1.1 trillion bill which imposes $6.5 billion in new spending cuts -- and then promptly declared both it and the rival House GOP proposal dead on arrival.

"Not to spoil the surprise, but we all know how it will turn out. We know neither will reach the president's desk as read," Reid predicted Friday, as he set the Senate up for a Tuesday vote on the House-passed bill to fund the government for the remaining seven months of the federal fiscal year.

"We'll end up back at square one without consensus, without a budget for the rest of this fiscal year, and without assurances that we can keep the country running," Reid said. "So, once these votes are behind us, and everyone's voice is heard, I hope each senator and member of Congress will find renewed motivation to do what we needed to do since the beginning, come together, negotiate in good faith."

As he also sought a vote on the new Democratic alternative, Reid repeatedly called the House GOP legislation "mean-spirited" and "political," describing the legislative process there as "a mad rush to see who could do the most sensational amendment." The GOP proposal, which passed the House, would have cut $61 billion from 2010 spending levels, while the Democrats' plan calls for $6.5 billion in new cuts, in addition to a $4 billion reduction agreed to in a bipartisan stopgap bill signed Wednesday by the president.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: congress; democrats; liberalfascism; reid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: ChildOfThe60s

Remember how large a trillion is. It take 32,000 YEARs to count to a trillion seconds. These fools are “arguing” over a few billion. Bastards.


21 posted on 03/05/2011 7:04:14 AM PST by hal ogen (1st amendment or reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen
Six billion, or even 60 billion, will do NOTHING to defer the oncoming collapse. They need a minimum of 600 billion this year.

This would mean ABOLISHING entire departments, permanently laying off the employees, and selling the buildings. To survive, we need to ELIMINATE the entirety of Johnson's "Great Society" legacy, just to start with. We need to eliminate the totality of the Dept of Education, Health and Human Services, the EPA, and a whole bunch more (and yes I know that these agencies were not started by Johnson).

The Dems will NEVER do this. They will prefer to hold on until the whole country crashes down.

22 posted on 03/05/2011 7:13:53 AM PST by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson