Posted on 03/04/2011 12:50:58 PM PST by Red Badger
Edited on 03/04/2011 1:04:44 PM PST by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
UNIONTOWN, Pa. (AP)
(Excerpt) Read more at vindy.com ...
I don’t like to encourage the coyotes any more than necessary.
Erect a HIGH fence with exception of closing the gate. When deer are eating you lawn close gate. When owners of said deer come to get them charge them grazing fees..... ;^}
LOL! I live on a hill on Lake Travis. Be kinda hard to fence the deer out, the way we are situated. We just have to grin and bear it-—
I wager you have a pet canine. Coyotes serve a purpose and if not a coyote, a possum, skunk, domestic canine, carrion beetle or bacteria will consume said carcass leftovers.
So the deer population is collectively owned?
I believe that is a well established point of law. The control of a given state's deer population is that of its DNR or some such department.
If the deer population is collectively owned than they were within their rights to hunt their own deer. Unfortunately, for all intents and purposes, deer are actually owned by the government, and that is plain wrong. Much worse than the supposed crime of killing a deer for food.
Who owns the government?
The government owns the government. We are long past a government for the people and by the people.
Hahahaha! My fiance is PSP and they call em Fayette Freds too!
You just know when there is a bizzare news story to be repoted on locally it’s coming from Fayette County.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.