Another ultra light .38/.357 revolver. The polymer technology should make the system cheaper, or what is the advantage over scandium/titanium? Interesting technology, now make it in .22 with a six inch barrel, and it would be a great camp gun! Picture at the link.
1 posted on
03/03/2011 4:10:06 AM PST by
marktwain
To: marktwain
As a gunsmith I will never understand how Taurus has become as successful as they are. Their products are inferior in every way. Parts are cheaply made and fitted. The steel is inferior and their service absolutely sucks. Has taken me up to TWO years to receive warranty parts on a brand new gun that came from the distributor screwed up. I know they’re cheaper, but how much is your life worth?
2 posted on
03/03/2011 4:19:33 AM PST by
ExpatGator
(I hate Illinois Nazis!)
To: marktwain
This is the only .38.357 for me.
To: marktwain
I love my Kimber CCII... killed a 5 1/2 foot Eastern Diamondback Rattler 20 feet from my front door with it... conceals perfectly... has stopping power that a .38 dreams of... it will git’er dun!
LLS
6 posted on
03/03/2011 4:36:06 AM PST by
LibLieSlayer
(WOLVERINES!!!)
To: marktwain
Never had aproblem with any Taurus product,
2 Raging Bulls- 44mag (2k plus rds) and 45 colt(250 rds).
1 Tracker- 44mag (Lost count)
2 24/7 9mm (thousands)
I am partial to Taurus and Ruger products for pistols.
Although they were all trajically lost due a boating accident and sitting on the bottom of an unknown lake.
9 posted on
03/03/2011 4:43:23 AM PST by
BigpapaBo
(If it don't kill you it'll make you _________!)
To: marktwain
I'll stick with something made out of metal.
20 posted on
04/02/2011 3:47:44 PM PDT by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open ( <o> ---)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson