Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/02/2011 8:32:24 AM PST by InvisibleChurch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: InvisibleChurch

The church is very wrong, but the decision is legally correct


2 posted on 03/02/2011 8:34:09 AM PST by MindBender26 (Fighting the "con" in Conservatism on FR since 1998.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: InvisibleChurch

Were I a prosecutor, I would sorta make it known that I considered the protests to be conduct that would provoke a reasonable person to commit a battery on the protestors....


3 posted on 03/02/2011 8:35:10 AM PST by henkster (Before we make any more "investments" we ought to be shown the prospectus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: InvisibleChurch

I believe that ending a funeral protest by physical force should be punishable by a fine up to $10.


9 posted on 03/02/2011 8:46:26 AM PST by ConservaTexan (February 6, 1911)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: InvisibleChurch
It seems to me that the Congress could ban these protests under its Article I powers to raise an army, reasoning that such protests interfere with the Federal government's ability to raise an army or conduct military operations (such as funeral honors for the fallen).

The SCOTUS has ruled repeatedly that these powers are not restrained by many of the provisions of the Bill of Rights, e.g. the ability to raise an army by coercion using conscription.

11 posted on 03/02/2011 8:47:34 AM PST by pierrem15 (Claudius: "Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud hatch out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: InvisibleChurch

Hate to say it, too, but the ruling is right. They are just not.


12 posted on 03/02/2011 8:48:14 AM PST by McKayopectate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: InvisibleChurch

This is absolute garbage.

The soldier’s family had won the support of 42 senators and 48 states for its case at the lower court level.

The SC argument on behalf of the “church” was made by an attorney who is the daughter of one of the church’s elders.

There is no possible way a decision against this horrifying and disrespectful harrassment at funerals could ever have been—in theory or practice—construed as “shredding the First Amendment”.

There are hundreds of venues in America through which this church or any other can exercise free speech and proselytize or proclaim their views. They don’t need to torture American families to do it.

Turning a private funeral for a U.S. serviceman killed in action defending the U.S. into a public event or vehicle which somehow has attached to it a “constitutional” responsibility to guarantee “freedom of speech” to anyone who wishes to disrupt it, is tantamount to authorizing and condoning oral vandalism and graffiti wherever and whenever it spontaneously appears.

The SC is now dedicated to convolution of the law and “sticking it” to middle America and anyone else who does not share or will not tolerate elitist values and principles which are at the heart of the left’s continuing attack upon American society from within.


18 posted on 03/02/2011 9:09:31 AM PST by 4Runner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: InvisibleChurch

What ever happened to the old charge of “disturbing the peace” or “inciting violence or a riot”? This is absurd and obscene. - I thought people were counter-protesting and blocking these Clinton buddies with support signs and American flags. Someone or group has to be bankrolling these lounge lizards to give the Christian churches a trumped up bad name. They are damned ungodly reprobates!


21 posted on 03/02/2011 9:12:53 AM PST by Twinkie ( PEACE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: InvisibleChurch

No problem. Real Americans and Real Christians will defeat the nut cases from WBC. No one expected the courts to get this right.
The ruling that affirms the idiots right to be there also affirms every patriot and Christian right to be there (at the families request) to defend the families of our fallen warriors.
There are far far more of us then the idiots..


23 posted on 03/02/2011 9:17:45 AM PST by SECURE AMERICA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: InvisibleChurch

Fine.

I guess the kooks will have to deal with getting their arses kicked at every protest.

Put some real fear into them.


29 posted on 03/02/2011 10:05:53 AM PST by roses of sharon ("Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in paradise." Luke 23:43)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: InvisibleChurch
The High Court got this one right. These douchebags have the right to protest but I would argue that we have just as much right to protest the protesters.

Patriot Guard Riders Group Pictures, Images and Photos

PATRIOT GUARD RIDERS
30 posted on 03/02/2011 10:32:22 AM PST by marine86297 (I'll never forgive Clinton for Somalia, my blood is on his hands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: InvisibleChurch
Gotta love Alito.Shook up the Obama “State of the Union”last year.:)”Obama criticized the Supreme Court's ruling last week that corporations can spend as much money as they want on political campaigns, saying it will “open the floodgates for special interests, including foreign corporations.”

As Obama said this, Alito could be seen shaking his head and saying, “not true.”I added Obama to the sentence.http://www.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2010/01/obama-vs-alito-face-off-at-the-state-of-the-union/1

42 posted on 03/02/2011 10:13:15 PM PST by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson