Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: savagesusie

Very nicely stated. :-) And I was unaware of Scalia’s right to life vs. states’ rights position, so you taught me something. Thanks.

You’d think he’d know better.


38 posted on 02/28/2011 10:12:46 PM PST by Lauren BaRecall (I love Natural Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Lauren BaRecall

As much as I like Scalia, I have been disappointed in his logic on abortion and homosexual marriage. If he understood the Constitution and its inception and tie with Natural Law Theory, then there is no way he can condone either of those things.....they deny unalienable rights to the child and they deny natural law and God’s Law of design of the man and woman. It is bizarre that he wavers on these two items. Everything else is fine but the fundamental freedom of religion is entailed in homosexual marriage and the right to raise your children with your religious beliefs is being destroyed by the secular humanism forced onto children with taxpayer money. The DOE is unconstitutional also....I don’t know why the court is so lax on protecting the Constitution, unless they are Marxist plants also. I know Ginsberg and Kagan and Sotomeyer are for sure. We are doomed if all three branches are now Marxists.


47 posted on 02/28/2011 10:35:52 PM PST by savagesusie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson