Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OneWingedShark
Do you have a right to be on my property? Yes or No

Do you have a right to stay if I tell you that I want you to leave? Yes or No

Must I have a good reason that you agree with for telling you to stay off or leave? Yes or No.

If your answers are anything other than No, No, and No, then you have no basic understanding of or appreciation for property rights, and I'm through with you.

If you answered No to all of the above and still want to maintain that you have a right to go somewhere under conditions wherein you are not welcome, then you are intellectually dishonest and tyrannical.

You nor anyone else will be forcing your desires on me on my property. As you are not a reasonable person, I would specifically not allow you to come onto my property armed, as I would not trust your judgment. Other people may be armed or not as I decide. Don't like that decision? Tough you don't get a say in the matter.

And again, or in your parlance *AGAIN*, conditions are conditional not dic tats. I cannot force you to disarm, I can only force you to leave. And that, believe me, I can force you to do.

81 posted on 03/05/2011 9:55:03 AM PST by SampleMan (If all of the people currently oppressed shared a common geography, bullets would already be flying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: SampleMan
>Do you have a right to be on my property? Yes or No

Generally no; HOWEVER, that might actually be dependent on some other [legal] condition; such as if I am renting living or storage space from you.

>Do you have a right to stay if I tell you that I want you to leave? Yes or No

See the above; some states have laws which give renters the right to challenge an eviction OR that give a time-limit in order for the tenant to move.

>Must I have a good reason that you agree with for telling you to stay off or leave? Yes or No.

No, you are free to do what you want... but you willfully miss the point that such actions might be illegal.

>If you answered No to all of the above and still want to maintain that you have a right to go somewhere under conditions wherein you are not welcome, then you are intellectually dishonest and tyrannical.

I believe I answered correctly.

As you are not a reasonable person, I would specifically not allow you to come onto my property armed, as I would not trust your judgment. Other people may be armed or not as I decide. Don't like that decision?

Interesting that you consider the insistence that you agree to a positive obligation to provide for my safety should I accept your condition to enter your property to qualify me as "not a reasonable person." Also interesting that pointing out what the law says qualifies me as "not a reasonable person."

84 posted on 03/05/2011 10:09:58 AM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson