Posted on 02/28/2011 3:57:32 PM PST by wagglebee
To join a Facebook page in support of the parents of Joseph Maraachli, click here.
LONDON, Ontario, February 28, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Dying one-year-old Joseph Maraachli, whose parents are entangled in a legal battle after doctors refused to perform a simple procedure that would allow him to die at home, should have had that procedure a long time ago, a pioneer in the field of neonatology has told LifeSiteNews.com.
But the physicians statements come on the same day that the hospital where Joseph is being kept has said it is willing to send him home, but with an important catch: they still refuse to perform the tracheostomy that allowed a sibling of Josephs who had a similar condition to live another six months at home. Instead they will simply return Joseph home, and then remove his ventilator, after which he will almost certainly die within a matter of minutes.
This solution is unacceptable to the family, Alex Schadenberg of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition told LSN this afternoon. Schadenberg has been working closely with the hospital to have their wishes respected.
They need to do a tracheostomy, said Dr. Paul Byrne, an Ohio neonatologist with nearly five decades of experience and a former president of the Catholic Medical Association. If the baby is stable otherwise, and has a tracheostomy, then the baby can be taken care of at home.
In a public information campaign launched Sunday night, London Health Sciences Centre, where Joseph has been treated since October, defended their refusal to perform the tracheostomy. They called the procedure, which involves inserting a breathing tube through a tiny slit in the throat, invasive, and said it is not a palliative procedure.
It is frequently indicated for patients who require a long term breathing machine, they wrote. This is not indicated for Baby Joseph because he has a progressive neurodegenerative disease that is fatal.
This wording was repeated in todays statement in which the hospital said Joseph could go home to die.
But Dr. Byrne told LifeSiteNews that theres no case when a child is on a ventilator where the tracheostomy wouldnt be indicated.
The hospital is now asking Ontarios Office of the Public Guardian to intervene and allow them to take Joseph off his ventilator, after the parents have continued to refuse consent. That office has been unsuccessful in asking other family members to consent instead, and could intervene itself any day.
Dr. Byrne called the attempt to have the state remove Josephs ventilator terrible, absolutely terrible, and insisted that in his fifty years in neonatology hes never removed a childs ventilator. Ive never seen a time to turn off a ventilator, he said. If a baby has a disease process thats so bad that theyre going to die, then they die on the ventilator anyway. So you dont have to stop the ventilator.
He also criticized the common phrase life support, saying, Life is either there or its not there. You dont have to hold up the life. What we do in medicine are actions ... that support the vital activity of respiration.
Assuming doctors can do something to support the vital activities, we ought to do them, he explained. And a tracheostomy ought to be done, and the baby ought to continue on the ventilator.
Though doctors have said Joseph is in a vegetative state, Dr. Byrne called it a made-up term similar to the notion of brain death, which he said was invented simply to get beating hearts for transplantation.
Even Josephs doctor in London has admitted that the tracheostomy could prolong his life. A tracheotomy would likely provide for a longer period of life, however, in our view would not result in improvement of well-being and could reduce quality of life, Dr. Douglas Fraser told the Ontario Consent and Capacity Board in January.
Along with their public information campaign, the hospital announced Sunday that they are considering legal action against unnamed individuals who they say have alleged that doctors might kill Joseph or that his death would be a case of euthanasia.
Joseph suffers from a severe neurological disorder, but his specific condition remains undiagnosed. Doctors have given him no chance of recovery, so his parents, Moe Maraachli and Sana Nader, have asked them to perform a tracheostomy which would enable him to breathe on his own, so that they could take him home. Their daughter died from similar complications eight years ago, but in that case doctors performed a tracheostomy and they were able to take her home.
On February 17th, Ontario Superior Court Justice Helen Rady upheld a January verdict from the Consent and Capacity Board of Ontario, which had supported the doctors move to take Joseph off life support against his parents wishes. The hospital had appeared set to remove Josephs life support last Monday, but that got delayed when the family hired expert lawyer Mark Handelman with the financial support of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition.
Justice Radys decision was based on doctors testimony that he is in a permanent vegetative state with no brain stem reflex. But the family says that footage released Thursday by LifeSiteNews belies the doctors claim. The videos, taken last weekend, show him flailing and reacting to tickling. They also show that his hands have been tied down - a measure the hospital took after Joseph removed the tube from his throat on at least two separate occasions.
The family has been trying to have Joseph transferred to a hospital in the U.S., where they believe hell get better care or at least a reassessment, and possibly the tracheostomy they need to bring him home.
In the last couple days, the case has drawn attention from major pro-life and anti-euthanasia groups in the U.S. who hope to find a hospital willing to take over Josephs care. Family members of euthanasia victim Terri Schiavo travelled to London last week to advocate for Joseph and Fr. Frank Pavone, national director of the U.S.-based Priests for Life, has pledged to pay for Joseph to be moved to a hospital in the U.S.
Alex Schadenberg, executive director of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition, warned in a Fox news interview that the court decision facilitates a system where doctors are authorized to force life and death decisions on patients. He has said he believes it is far worse than the death panels recently debated in the U.S. as part of the federal health care law.
Its the hospitals and the doctors once again usurping their power over the people, he said. Thats whats happening. And they have significant power - they have the money and the courts behind them. Its absolutely ridiculous.
Over 12,000 people have rallied behind the parents through the Facebook page Save baby Joseph.
To make a donation to cover the legal costs please click here.
To join a Facebook page in support of the parents of Joseph Maraachli, click here.
Contact Information:
Bonnie Adamson
President and CEO, London Health Sciences Centre
800 Commissioners Road East
London, Ontario Canada N6A 5W9
Phone: 519-685-8462
E-mail: bonnie.adamson@lhsc.on.ca
Dalton McGuinty, Premier
Legislative Building
Queens Park
Toronto ON M7A 1A1
Fax: (416) 325-3745
E-mail: Use this form.
Tim Hudak, Opposition Leader
The Ontario PC Party
19 Duncan Street
Suite 401
Toronto, ON M5H 3H1
Phone: 416-861-0020
Toll-free: 1-800-903-6453
Fax: 416-861-9593
Email: tim.hudakco@pc.ola.org
Yet they somehow believe that killing Baby Joseph would improve his "quality of life."
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
Wouldn’t it be nice if a pro-life doctor would just go in there and voluntarily do it for free.
bttt
I don’t know what to do except pray for this little fella. What a tragic sroty if it unfolds the way this hospital (Canadian govt right?) Has its way
This is but a glimpse into the future... where government panels, doctors and the “elite” will want to make these decisions for you... and use force if you disagree.
That would be nice, but the hospital would probably prevent that. This is just me guessing, but I believe once they get on a course of death, they don’t want to be embarrassed or vilified and have any other outcome—even if it is only for a few months of life. I think they will do all they can now to make sure that baby dies to justify what they have been doing. The vast majority of the public will soon forget and the hospital will be business as usual.
Though doctors have said Joseph is in a vegetative state," Dr. Byrne called it a made-up term similar to the notion of brain death, which he said was invented simply to get beating hearts for transplantation.
Important words to remember.
Do not let doctors tell you your loved one is
a "vegetable"
or "in a vegetative state"
or "brain dead."
These are made-up terms, as Dr. Byrne says.
They were made up by an arrogant class of doctors/bureaucrats/organ profiteers, in order to convince frightened or confused family members to take their loved ones off of "life support," when this is often not in the patient's best interest.
And they’re threatening to sue people for suggesting they want to kill the child, even though they’re obviously doing whatever they can to kill the child.
I am of two minds on this. On one hand I am the father who wants to prolong the life of the child as long as possible.
On the other hand is the person who knows that even with the tracheotomy, it is just delaying the inevitable, and during that whole time, the parents are asking other citizens to continue to pay the huge medical costs so that they can spend a few more weeks with their dying baby.
I think that instead of appealing to the Canadian health care system, I would spend the time begging God to spare my child.
It’s beyond me why anyone would ever trust a “doctor” who doesn’t know the difference between vegetables and human beings.
First of all, the cost of a tracheotomy is next to nothing.
Secondly, Canadians PAY FOR THEIR HEALTH CARE in the form of very high taxes.
Finally, there are groups that are entirely willing and able to pay for Baby Joseph's care:
a doctor refusing to do such a simple proceedure is just plain egotistical and evil..
“On the other hand is the person who knows that even with the tracheotomy, it is just delaying the inevitable”
Hard to say that it is inevitable when they don’t know the cause. Besides, this is a relatively simple procedure that well allow the parents to take care of him for however long he has so why not?
That is what I was thinking..but the hospital would have to approve it..
That is the problem with National health care.. the bottom line is ALWAYS money
Money quote.
And the parents want to care for him at home, which will cost the state little to nothing, compared to hospital care.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.