Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Sham
We don't know whether he did or (did not fail).

In order to select the proper procedural tools to resolve the issue effectively, one should recognize that Obama would not be president if he had failed. Failing to qualify and certification as president are inconsistent concepts.

Let me offer an example. Three traveling salesmen need a motel room for the night. So they stop and the crew leader goes to the motel office to get the room. The desk clerk quotes him $30, which the leader pays. He returns to the car and receives a $10 bill from each of the other two.

A few minutes later the clerk realizes he gave them a $25 room. He calls the bellhop (go with it) and tells him to take five, one dollar bills to their room. On the way, the bellhop cleverly determines there is no way the 3 guys can split the five evenly and decides to pocket $2 and return only the balance.

At this point, each salesman is out $9 (10-1). Three times 9 is 27, plus there are 2 bucks in the bellhop’s pocket.

27+2 = 29, where is the other dollar?

95 posted on 03/02/2011 3:40:36 PM PST by frog in a pot (We need a working definition of "domestic enemies" if the oath of office is to have meaning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: frog in a pot
"one should recognize that Obama would not be president if he had failed."

I agree. That's why my suspicions are that we currently do not have a President.

27+2 = 29, where is the other dollar?

They paid a TOTAL of 27, not 30. Of the 27, 25 went to the hotel and the other "2" went to the bellhop.

100 posted on 03/02/2011 9:07:02 PM PST by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson