Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservative Leaders to Boehner: Defunding Planned Parenthood is Non-Negotiable
CNS News ^ | 2/24/2011 | Terence P. Jeffrey

Posted on 02/27/2011 4:53:36 AM PST by IbJensen

(CNSNews.com) - A coalition of prominent pro-life conservative leaders sent House Speaker John Boehner (R.-Ohio) a letter on Thursday stating their position that an amendment sponsored by Rep. Mike Pence (R.-Ind.) that prohibits federal funding of Planned Parenthood must be a “non-negotiable” element in any continuing resolution that House Republicans agree to enact next week to keep the government funded past March 4.

“Defunding Planned Parenthood must be a non-negotiable in the Continuing Resolution and we urge you to accept nothing less than this outcome,” the conservatives told Boehner.

In its most recent annual report, Planned Parenthood said it took in $349.6 million in government funds in fiscal 2008. That same year, Planned Parenthood says it performed 324,008 abortions.

The pro-life conservatives who called on Speaker Boehner not to agree to any CR that permits federal funding of Planned Parenthood included, among others, Susan B. Anthony List President Marjorie Dannenfelser, Eagle Forum President Phyllis Schlafly, Let Freedom Ring President Colin Hanna, Concerned Women for America CEO Penny Nance, Hispanic Leadership Fund President Mario Lopez, American Values President Gary Bauer, American Principles Project President Frank Cannon, and RedState.com Editor Erick Erickson.

The continuing resolution enacted at the end of last year by the lameduck Congress expires on March 4. To keep the government funded after that date, Congress must pass, and President Barack Obama must sign, a new continuing resolution.

Planned Parenthood cannot receive federal funding after March 4, when the current continuing resolution expires, unless the Republican majority in the House agrees to permit Planned Parenthood funding in the new continuing resolution that is needed to fund the government after that date. If House Republicans prohibit continued funding of Planned Parenthood after March 4, the Obama administration may not disburse any additional funds to Planned Parenthood after that date.

Article 1, Section 9, Clause 7 of the Constitution states: “No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law.”

The version of the continuing resolution that the House passed last week—but the Senate did not take up--included an amendment sponsored by Rep. Mike Pence that expressly prohibited any federal funding of Planned Parenthood or its local affiliates.

“None of the funds made available by this Act may be made available for any purpose to Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. or any of the … affiliates of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc.,” said Pence’s amendment.

The House voted to approve this amendment 240 to 185, with seven Republicans voted against it and 10 Democrats for it.

“I believe that ending an innocent human life is morally wrong,” Pence said on the House floor on Feb. 17 in defense of his amendment.

“But I rise tonight because I also believe it's morally wrong to take the taxpayer dollars of millions of pro-life Americans and use it to fund organizations that provide and promote abortion--like Planned Parenthood of America,” said Pence.

Planned Parenthood “must be defunded of federal tax dollars and now is the time to do it,” the conservative leaders said in their letter to Speaker Boehner.

“The House vote in support of Rep. Mike Pence’s Amendment 11 to prevent government funding for the nation’s largest abortion provider, Planned Parenthood, is an excellent start,” the conservatives told the speaker. “However, the House vote on the Pence Amendment is nothing more than symbolic unless it remains intact through the legislative process. Defunding Planned Parenthood must be a non-negotiable in the Continuing Resolution and we urge you to accept nothing less than this outcome.”

Rep. Nita Lowey (D.-N.Y.), speaking on the House floor in opposition to the Pence amendment, accused Republicans of supporting federally funded family planning for horses but not for women.

“[A] Member of the majority--in fact, another gentleman from Indiana--proposed providing birth control to horses,” Lowey said during floor debate on the Pence amendment. “And now we are considering an amendment attacking Planned Parenthood, which has provided health services to one in five American women. So it seems to me that Republicans believe that horses should have family planning, but women should not.”


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: evilregime; righttolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: IbJensen

Why could he not find his veto pen during his first 6 years of office?


21 posted on 02/27/2011 6:39:08 AM PST by Soul of the South (When times are tough the tough get going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: grania

I couldn’t agree more.

Nothing would send a more resounding follow-up shot across the bow than for the conservatives in this country to raise such a protest against Boehner that he is forced to step down and a true “representative” to take his place, fight our fight without apology, without compromise, and without regret.


22 posted on 02/27/2011 7:15:53 AM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

In each of the past three years, Americans donated approximately $300 billion to charities. There is plenty of money for people who really believe in the mission of Planned Parenthood to donate to it.

People as wealthy and well known as George Soros, Bill and Melinda Gates through their Foundation and Warren Buffet have set the example for others by generously supporting Planned Parenthood in the past. A well-crafted appeal should easily be able to make up any cut in government funding. If that is the case, why must government donate a single dime?


23 posted on 02/27/2011 7:50:38 AM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

I had always assumed, which I shouldn’t have, that Laura Bush was a conservative. It turns out she’s not very conservative.

Texas is OK. There’s parts about it that I really like and others that I don’t like. I wasn’t forced to go, I chose the DFW area. I’d always heard how conservative Texas was and now that I live here it’s not that conservative. Maybe out in rural areas it is, but there is a lot of liberal lunacy going on in the DFW area—UN initiatives which I believe cause high taxation, sanctuary cities and illegals running all over the place. I still see an awful lot of “Obama for President” bumper stickers. Maybe that’s true of all big cities. I don’t even want to go to Austin—I hear that’s the weirdest of all.


24 posted on 02/27/2011 2:00:02 PM PST by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz

Austin and surrounding areas are absolustely beautiful, BUT, big BUT.
It is about as liberal as you’ll find.


25 posted on 02/27/2011 2:08:54 PM PST by Joe Boucher ((FUBO))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson