Skip to comments.
AFL CIO Chief: Raising Taxes Will Create Jobs
Yahoo Finance ^
| Feb. 25, 2011
| Peter Gorenstein
Posted on 02/25/2011 7:40:44 AM PST by econjack
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Guys like this obviously have never taken an econ course. The gov't spending multiplier is always one less than the private spending multiplier. Simply stated: Let me keep my money and I'll create more jobs than the gov't could ever hope to create. Notice how he advocates a financial transaction tax.
1
posted on
02/25/2011 7:40:51 AM PST
by
econjack
To: econjack
Does The AFL-CIO pay taxes?
2
posted on
02/25/2011 7:41:28 AM PST
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: econjack
I just can’t STAND it anymore!!!
This guy is SUCH an EEEEEDJIT!!!!!
3
posted on
02/25/2011 7:42:46 AM PST
by
matginzac
To: econjack
Hey, Trumka? Gas has already gone up 25 cents in the last two days, you ass. We need a gas tax CUT, not an increase.
}:-)4
4
posted on
02/25/2011 7:42:55 AM PST
by
Moose4
("By all that you hold dear on this good Earth, I bid you stand, Men of the West!")
To: Texas Eagle
Tax the benefits of the public employee union worker that are over and above those earned by the private sector.
To: Toddsterpatriot; Mase; expat_panama
Who knew Trumka was a FReeper posting on econ threads here?
6
posted on
02/25/2011 7:44:08 AM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: econjack
Except when those paying the taxes loose their job then the rest of the people paying taxes will get to pay more. Same old socialist mantra of spreading the wealth in a different way.
7
posted on
02/25/2011 7:44:14 AM PST
by
ReverendJames
(Only A Painter Or A Liberal Can Change Black To White.)
To: econjack
Even if he understood economics,
he’d still have the same agenda.
These guys really don’t care about “jobs” as much as they care about sucking as much life out of their fellow citizens as possible.
They’ll vote, every time, to keep all the benefits and payscales for the senior union members at the expense of jobs for less senior members.
8
posted on
02/25/2011 7:44:47 AM PST
by
MrB
(Tagline suspended for important announcement on my home page. Click my handle.)
To: econjack
These are make-work projects. Money taken from the people, filtered through govt agencies, and targeted at union jobs. And every hand that the money goes through takes a piece of the dough.
9
posted on
02/25/2011 7:45:07 AM PST
by
lurk
To: econjack
"Specifically, he wants to raise the federal gas tax as a means to fund infrastructure spending"HE wants to? HE wants to raise taxes to fund "infrastructure" (read: unions). Interesting he thinks HE has the power to do this. Then again, we've always known who runs the Obama administration.
10
posted on
02/25/2011 7:45:27 AM PST
by
cake_crumb
(Why do they call them "pat downs" when they're obviously "feel ups"?)
To: econjack
The Secretary/Treasurer of the AFL-CIO is Liz Shuler, Rep. Heath Shuler’s cousin. Am I the only one who sees a red flag?
11
posted on
02/25/2011 7:45:38 AM PST
by
ryderann
To: econjack
This just goes to show how far gone these liberals, democrats, union leaders, they are.
Ask them for absolute proof of that claim and then watch them sputter, hem and haw trying to defend that position (they cant).
Liberals, democrats and union leaders are commies and they are also friggin nuts!
To: econjack
Tumpka needs to sit in a class with Tom Sowell for 15 weeks. Dumb protectionist creep.
13
posted on
02/25/2011 7:46:36 AM PST
by
4Liberty
(88% of Americans are NON-UNION. We value honest, peaceful Free trade-NOT protectionist CARTELS)
To: Moose4
If Obama would open oil drilling back up here, the price per barrel would go down.
14
posted on
02/25/2011 7:46:56 AM PST
by
cake_crumb
(Why do they call them "pat downs" when they're obviously "feel ups"?)
To: econjack
So he advocates spending another 450 Billion a year, because obviously we are not spending enough at 3.7 Trillion. I mean 4.2 Trillion has got to be better than the 2 Trillion that the govt currently brings in.
In another unrelated story, Mrs. Runninglips was griping the other day about the piddling $60K I was spending on household upkeep, food, clothing etc. She mentioned that if we just spent $130K over the next 5 years, the kids will prosper, the carpet will be improved, and of course the entire neighborhood will thrive.
15
posted on
02/25/2011 7:47:58 AM PST
by
runninglips
(government debt = slavery of the masses)
To: econjack
Mr. Trumka, as a California driver who spends entirely more time than I care to think about in the car, on the freeways, burning gas, I have a two-word answer for you. The second word is “you”.
16
posted on
02/25/2011 7:48:24 AM PST
by
RichInOC
(No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
To: econjack
Mr. Trumka, lets run your $256,000,000,000 request by the GOP House. Oh, Darn!...they said NO. To save you some time, they also have an answer to all of your other union thug, brain-dead ideas....NO!!!!
17
posted on
02/25/2011 7:48:47 AM PST
by
JPG
(As WI goes, so goes the nation. Thank you, Gov Walker.)
To: cake_crumb
HE visits the White House a couple of times a week and is one of Zer0’s top advisors.
18
posted on
02/25/2011 7:49:07 AM PST
by
Roccus
(Who knows?........Who cares?........Why bother?)
To: econjack
oh, PLEASE, Barry, take Richie’s advice with the cost per gallon shooting up towards $4
To: Texas Eagle
Translation: unions want a dedicated revenue source. It’s such a bother electing politicians.
Not to mention that there is already a gas tax that’s supposed to go into a highway fund.
20
posted on
02/25/2011 7:49:24 AM PST
by
y6162
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson