Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kansas City Federal Reserve .... Thomas Hoenig calls for Wall Street banks to be broken up
Telegraph ^ | 02/23/11 | Andrew Trotman

Posted on 02/24/2011 4:59:49 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster

Kansas City Federal Reserve Bank President Thomas Hoenig calls for Wall Street banks to be broken up

A member of the US Federal Reserve has called for Wall Street's financial giants to be broken up to avoid another another crisis.

By Andrew Trotman 11:07PM GMT 23 Feb 2011

“I am convinced that the existence of too-big-to-fail financial institutions poses the greatest risk to the US economy,” Kansas City Federal Reserve Bank President Thomas Hoenig said.

“They must be broken up. We must make sure that large financial organizations are not in position to hold the US economy hostage. We must not allow organisations operating under the safety net to pursue high-risk activities and we cannot let large organisations put our financial system at risk.”

Mr Hoenig also argues that the most sweeping overhaul of US financial regulation since the Great Depression won’t prevent the largest banks from taking excessive risks and increasing market share.

“In my view, it is even worse than before the crisis,” he said. “As well-intentioned as the Dodd-Frank Act may be, it will not improve outcome.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hoenig; kcfed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 02/24/2011 4:59:53 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; PAR35; AndyJackson; Thane_Banquo; nicksaunt; MadLibDisease; happygrl; ...

P!


2 posted on 02/24/2011 5:00:34 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster (The way to crush the bourgeois is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I prefer we break up the federal reserve bank.


3 posted on 02/24/2011 5:00:51 AM PST by BillGunn (Bill Gunn for Congress district one rep. Massachusetts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Always a good idea. Same for the big commercial banks!


4 posted on 02/24/2011 5:01:30 AM PST by SonOfDarkSkies ('And what rough beast, its hour come round at last, slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?' Yeats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Amen. But don’t hold your breath, unless your favorite color is blue.


5 posted on 02/24/2011 5:01:39 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Agreed. Restore Glass-Steagall first.Then limit the size of the big eight banks. B of A is too big. As is Citi, and JPM.


6 posted on 02/24/2011 5:02:27 AM PST by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I have a better idea. SHUT DOWN THE FED!


7 posted on 02/24/2011 5:03:34 AM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
AMEN!

They should right now re-impose the 1933 Glass-Steagall Act and give those Wall Street banks 18 months to separate out banking and investment operations. I mean think about it: the 1987 stock market crash and the 1997-1999 Asian financial crisis had little effect on the US economy because bank assets were not at risk due to Glass-Steagall in place.

8 posted on 02/24/2011 5:04:42 AM PST by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

He’s absolutely correct.


9 posted on 02/24/2011 5:06:38 AM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Unluckily for us, it seems like the big banks RUN the government.


10 posted on 02/24/2011 5:07:03 AM PST by Huck (one per-center)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Those big investment banks, along with their subsidiary the Fed, are essentially running the country. Don’t expect to see Washington do anything against them - ever.


11 posted on 02/24/2011 5:07:20 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Why O why did I read *must be blown up*?


12 posted on 02/24/2011 5:08:33 AM PST by wolfcreek (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

yeah well..DC can do it...or We the People eventually WILL do it..


13 posted on 02/24/2011 5:08:35 AM PST by mo ("If you understand, no explanation is needed; if you do not, no explanation is possible")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mo

its a lot better than Dodd- Frank which in July we will start paying bank fees.


14 posted on 02/24/2011 5:10:07 AM PST by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies; TigerLikesRooster

Given the power of modern computer systems there’s no reason why we couldn’t limit the brick and mortar side of banking to be limited to a single county ~ like things were a couple of decades ago.


15 posted on 02/24/2011 5:13:27 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Two years too late or better late than never?


16 posted on 02/24/2011 5:13:45 AM PST by griswold3 (Second law of thermodynamics. Are we there yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
wow finally someone with a brain

No business to should allowed to become “to big to fail”, in fact that should be the very criteria for braking up a business.

17 posted on 02/24/2011 5:31:44 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama = Carter 2.0 The Epic Fail edition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88

There ya go again. Clouding the issue with common sense and logic!


18 posted on 02/24/2011 5:34:24 AM PST by Roccus (Who knows?........Who cares?........Why bother?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
I don't know what the best method is for keeping financial institutions from getting too large to fail, but I generally like the idea of giving them complete flexibility under certain size restrictions as to what assets might be divested.

This general concept is quite good for the economy because it encourages the development and divestiture of profitable organizations (institutions become incubators)...and that is good for the profitability of the divesting organization and good for overall competitiveness in the financial industry because small organizations are more creative and resourceful (all other things being equal).

Of course, the divestiture of unprofitable operations is also a good thing in that "one company's trash is another company's treasure."

19 posted on 02/24/2011 5:36:10 AM PST by SonOfDarkSkies ('And what rough beast, its hour come round at last, slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?' Yeats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88
Amen to that! I was on Wall St before the repeal of Glass-Steagall and it was quite effective at limiting underwriting risk to those institutions who had no "depositor" exposure.
20 posted on 02/24/2011 5:42:38 AM PST by SonOfDarkSkies ('And what rough beast, its hour come round at last, slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?' Yeats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson