Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MrB; Daisyjane69

I don’t understand your point.

Catholics have many children and they don’t need polygamy to do it.

Look at population growth in Latin American (Catholic) countries. It matches muzzie growth.

How does restricting the number of fathers promote more offspring among the mothers? Please explain.

If every woman is capable of having (let’s say, for example) 10 children in her lifetime, how does assigning women 4 - 1 to certain wealthy males increase the number of children overall? Please explain.

You are obviously one of the arithmetically challenged people I was referring to.

And Daisyjane, you were right. They flocked.


15 posted on 02/23/2011 5:12:28 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: samtheman

I wasn’t promoting polygamy amongst Westerners.
I was promoting traditional families (one mother, one father + children) having bigger families in spite of the left’s “jihad” against the traditional family.


19 posted on 02/23/2011 5:19:28 AM PST by MrB (Tagline suspended for important announcement on my home page. Click my handle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: samtheman
How does restricting the number of fathers promote more offspring among the mothers? Please explain.

It does not. There have been articles posted very recently that proves that while a man siring 50 children, might be a feather in some man's caps, if a man has 50 wives and 50 children, that means those wives are below the norm in producing children. Only liberal math can see this in any other way.

28 posted on 02/23/2011 5:39:18 AM PST by Graybeard58 (Of course Obama loves his country. The thing is, Sarah loves mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson