[freedomwarrior998]

You don’t know the facts here. You don’t know what sort of actus rea and mens rea the prosecutor had to prove. Moreover, there are many occasions when non-leos are not charged in cases like this. The prosecutor sometimes decides that the parent has suffered enough. LEO or not.

I find it hilarious that you are taking this tantrum when you know nothing about the details of the case.

How are you different from any liberal? You seem to want the law applied a certain way because of who it is going to be applied against. Facts mean nothing apparently.

[Gondring]

And a correlation with "LEO/Non-LEO" doesn't necessarily mean a corruption problem, either. For example, it could be that LEOs tend to protect their firearms better than those who aren't--so when there is an accident, it might typically be less negligent in the case of LEOs.

That being said, it would be interesting to see if the state laws are being applied differently based on location (i.e., which DA is it?) and whether the person is an LEO.

[TSgt]

Yeah, I am unable to read the facts via multiple media outlets and make any logical judgments.

Only the DA has the power to understand logic.

Me 2+2=5
DA 2+2=4

FU

[TSgt]

Your good friend, the prosecutor, is more interested in cases with dead cows:

Mistrial in “Dead Cows” trial
http://www.libertyherald.net/articles/2007/05/01/democrat/news/news01.txt
“I admonished the witnesses that they could not comment on cattle being out in the past, but we had to show that the defendant knew that the cattle were out. It was a tough thing to prove that [Wollyung] had knowledge of that without talking about the cows being out,” Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney Melvin Wilhelm said.

Laws are for us little people...