To: NFHale; animal172; hiredhand; Gilbo_3; Squantos
RE :”
Personally - and I don’t know if there’s any legal way to do this - but if ship owners won’t arm their crews, they should be held legally and financially responsible for the welfare and safety of the crewmembers, and directly prosecutable by families should harm come to their loved ones as a result of negligence/failure to provide adequatae security in the face of KNOWN “
Just to be the fly in the ointment again, because I was thinking the same thing myself: I bet they sign waivers to work, or work for foreign companies. Just speculating. I was also guessing the ship owners care about getting the ship and cargo back first, and the crew last(unemployment is high) , so that's why they dont allow arms.
Are you proposing new work regulations?? Maybe a union?? :) Just teasing.
194 posted on
02/23/2011 8:59:10 AM PST by
sickoflibs
("It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
To: sickoflibs
“...Are you proposing new work regulations?? Maybe a union??...”
What da hell do you think I am, a low-life “community organizer” or sumpin’??? Hahah!
195 posted on
02/23/2011 9:04:26 AM PST by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
To: sickoflibs
“Are you proposing new work regulations?? Maybe a union?? :) Just teasing.”
Actually hadn't thought of that, but sounds like a plan. Could we enlist the Wisconsin teachers and their Commurat Senators?
197 posted on
02/23/2011 9:43:38 AM PST by
animal172
(Can a girl with a mole on her face be happy married to a gopher?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson