But, since you've brought it up, Walker has been quite clear about what he would ultimately like to see happen to public service unions. But, he realizes you have to crawl before you walk. It's about incrementalism.
Now, what any of that has to do with Sarah Palin's inability or unwillingness to specifically address the problems as they relate to the current Wisconsin wranglings, is a mystery - apparently only known to you.
Sarah Palin drafts an essay of love to union members, while avoiding comment on the substantive reforms that are needed. Why is that?
New tagline...
You talk about rich. You accused Palin of riding the fence. I point out that Walker is also “riding the fence” on several of these issues and you try to dodge and change the subject. saying that Walker has a hidden plan to wipe out unions by taking small bites giving him the benefit of the doubt yet you immediately assume the worse about Gov Palin. Can you say double standard. We get it you don't like palin.
Okay, incrementalism from Scott Walker is a good thing, while incrementalism from Sarah Palin, is "an essay of love".