[FreeReign]

This thread isn't about Scott Walker. It's about Sarah Palin's bizarre ode to public service unions. But, since you've brought it up, Walker has been quite clear about what he would ultimately like to see happen to public service unions. But, he realizes you have to crawl before you walk. It's about incrementalism....Sarah Palin drafts an essay of love to union members, while avoiding comment on the substantive reforms that are needed. Why is that?

Okay, incrementalism from Scott Walker is a good thing, while incrementalism from Sarah Palin, is "an essay of love".

[OldDeckHand]

'while incrementalism from Sarah Palin"

There's nothing "incremental" in Palin's essay. She does not address collective bargaining, at all, nor does she address forced union membership. Instead, she pens a bizarre letter to members to fight against their "union bosses".

This has NOTHING to do with union bosses. It has everything to do with legislation that is being held up by Democrats trying to subvert the will of the people.

[unseen1]

hush now. the logic might frighten him....