Skip to comments.
Why the Supreme Court has been compelled to hold a new hearing on Obama’s eligibility.
HillBuzz ^
| February 17,2011
| Kevin DuJan
Posted on 02/17/2011 8:31:53 PM PST by dalight
Drudge has linked this story from World Net Daily that notes the odd decision by the Supreme Court to hold a new conference on Obamas eligibility to hold the presidency.
Lets research WHY the court could be compelled to do this.
It MUST have something to do with the fact that Obama has no birth certificate on file in the Hawaiian Hall of Records with the name Barack Hussein Obama on it since his original Hawaiian birth certificate with that name was sealed in the 1970s when he was adopted in Indonesia by Lolo Soetoro, his stepfather. At the time of adoption, a childs original birth certificate is sealed away and replaced in the Hall of Records by a new birth certificate that bears the adopted parents names and the childs new name, if a new name is given.
This is what happened to Obama, when he was renamed Soetobakh by his mother and stepfather at the time of adoption.
(Excerpt) Read more at hillbuzz.org ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birther; certifigate; hillbuzz; ineligible; naturalborncitizen; obama; soetobakh; unconstitutional; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 401-415 next last
To: jamese777
You and your ilk over at Dr. Conspiracy stated Vattel is merely a Swiss jurist..
![Photobucket](http://i870.photobucket.com/albums/ab264/Dragging_Canoe/FoundationsoftheConstitution.png)
The classical foundations of the American Constitution: prevailing wisdom By David J. Bederman page 110
To: jamese777
![Photobucket](http://i870.photobucket.com/albums/ab264/Dragging_Canoe/VattelUnrivaled.png)
The classical foundations of the American Constitution: prevailing wisdom By David J. Bederman
To: bushpilot1; jamese777
Golly, I’m looking forward to your citing Puffendorf’s Law of Nature...what did Puffendorf have to say about the matter?
(He is listed just above Vattel).
And there is Burlamaque...what did HE say?
343
posted on
02/20/2011 5:10:53 PM PST
by
Mr Rogers
(Poor history is better than good fiction, and anything with lots of horses is better still)
To: bigbob
You are joking, right? Bill Ted Baxter” is the biggest coward. He always has the same guests on saying the same thing. Why won’t he have Joe Farah on his show? Because he is afraid.
To: Honorary Serb
and what about the fake SSN’s that the usurper is using? Jerome Corsi is coming out with that.
To: Mr Rogers
How well I remember Puffendorf's last words to me,:
"Meinst du das, mein Kenny, oder sagst du das nur?"
Unusually for me, I was at a loss for words.
Jean-Jacques Burlamaqui was part of Thomas Jefferson's Cliff Notes Library, and actually had a great influence on the writers of the Constitution. And here I thought I would never hear that name again! Just WOW, Mr. Rogers!
Now I am embarrassed because I actually had never heard of Sam Puffendorf ... and don't really need to. Burlamaqui is good enough.
346
posted on
02/20/2011 5:29:59 PM PST
by
Kenny Bunk
(With a friend like Obama, a country needs no enemies.)
To: Mr Rogers; jamese777
The Framing generation was classically trained...you all are obama trained.
It permeates in all of your posts.
Vattels influence on the Founders was “unrivaled”.
Peregrine Obamas influence on Mr. Rogers and jamese77 is unrivaled.
To: rambo316; Honorary Serb
If Dr. Jerome Corsi's breathless and sensational writing style were less like the "Hardy Boys and Their Electric Speedboat," or "Nancy Drew and the NAZI Spy" more people would read him seriously. He is an indefatigable and accurate researcher, his facts are always correct, but the way (The WND Way) he strings'em together is often pretty silly.*
case in point: The title of this thread,
"Why the Supreme Court has been compelled to
hold a new hearing on Obamas eligibility"
Well, yeah, that's actually sort of true. However, to be precise, the SCOTUS is conferencing on Lawyer Hemenway's brilliant motion for recusal of Kommie Kagan and Carmen Miranda Sotomayor. They may, MAY, consider Hemenway's request that they examine other matters. In turning Hemenway down initially, they broke their own rules. He pointed it out, and now they are revisiting the issue. Nobody "compels" the SCOTUS.
But make no mistake. This development, is a tremendous victory for our team ... but shouldn't be "oversold," at the cost of credibility.
*I actually admire the guy and diligently read everything he writes ... but he invites heat, when what we need is light. We got enough trouble getting the right people to pay attention. And if you are a GGL fan, you may have heard me tell him and Joseph Farah this directly!
348
posted on
02/20/2011 5:51:46 PM PST
by
Kenny Bunk
(With a friend like Obama, a country needs no enemies.)
To: jamese777
Going to put an end to your lies on free republic regarding Vattels influence on the Founders.
![Photobucket](http://i870.photobucket.com/albums/ab264/Dragging_Canoe/Vattelsinfluenceonframers.png)
The constitution as treaty: the international legal constructionalist ... By Francisco Forrest Martin
To: jamese777
To: jamese777
To: jamese777
To: jamese777
To: jamese777
To: jamese777
Your Golden Calf
To: bushpilot1
To: jamese777
To: jamese777
To: bushpilot1
The bastard can settle and flay but that’s it.
359
posted on
02/20/2011 8:48:20 PM PST
by
eyedigress
((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
To: headstamp 2
Electing Obama = electing a pig in a poke.
360
posted on
02/20/2011 8:52:41 PM PST
by
bannie
(( ))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 401-415 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson