Posted on 02/15/2011 11:51:25 PM PST by pissant
Sarah Palin told reporters that she would have no problem with the porn lobby being cosponsors and holding respected seats at the table at last week's CPAC meeting. Nor does she have a problem with Planned Parenthood. After all, these are "different, diverse groups involved in political discourse" – so why not allow them all to crowd in under the "conservative" umbrella?
Actually, she didn't say these things, but instead told Fox News "gay" groups had a right to be at CPAC. But, why not these others as well? Don't they fit her broad qualifications, as stated above? Why not allow anyone or any group, truly, as long as they decide to label themselves "conservative"? Who cares if Rachel Maddow shows up, saying she's a conservative? Hail to "conservatives" Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and Al Sharpton! Why not?
Isn't dialogue important?
Actually, no. When a group espouses a certain set of standards, there ought to be some "truth-in-labeling" involved. Are pro-lifers at NOW meetings? No, and for good reason. It's called integrity. Their presence would signal an endorsement of abortion. Attendance says, "I will listen to these people." But there are some points that are not open for discussion, not for people with strong convictions.
Discover what military personnel and decorated vets think of ending DADT in Whistleblower magazine's dramatic February issue, "DROPPING THE H-BOMB"
Why would any Christian conservative listen to guys who have sex with each other and are working diligently to silence those who tell them this might not be a great idea? With traditional conservatives, the GOProud homosexual group has zero credibility, yet Sarah has just given them quite a bit. She has made a big mistake, if she believes there's a legitimate "debate" that we can hold with sodomy advocates.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Nope. She was specifically talking about DADT opposition. There was no homoerotic porn videos shown by Capt Honors. No porn whatsoever. The Palinistas are spinning this hard.
B U M P
If she didn't support McCain, I'm sure all the PDS folks would be accusing her of being a back stabbing bit@h for not supporting the guy who brung her to the dance.
I already know the Liberals who have always hated her would have loved to have their arrow in their quill.
W have a long way to go before our Candidate is chosen. Whoever it is will be better than Obama, and I mean WHOEVER.
No, PA, my words are fom Tammy’s column. Bob
Here is what transpired, lifted right off of Tammy's twitter site:
I'm focused on economic issues, and you may have noticed I was being quiet about DADT because that's not our most pressing issue... 7:11 PM Jan 3rd via web
(Me: notice the continuation dots, meaning the next post is a continuation - twitter posts only allow 140 characters)
But this hypocrisy is just truly too much. Enuf already--the more someone complains about the homos the more we should look under their bed 7:12 PM Jan 3rd via web
Me: How can you possibly construe that as NOT about DADT, especially when 15 minutes earlier she posted THIS:
And military brass was worried about DADT? "sailors dressed in drag mimic masturbation... sailors simulate a rectal exam" http://is.gd/k3sIH 6:56 PM Jan 3rd via web
Me: And then after she found out Palin had retweeted her message, she said THIS:
I think @SarahPalinUSA RT my tweet is her first comment on DADT, treatment of gays & attempts to marginalize us--thank you Governor Monday, January 03, 2011 7:50:20 PM via web
Me: There is no spin in the world that can dispute 3 things:
1) A retweet without comment as Palin did, is a sign of AGREEMENT, especially if it from a friend.
2) It had everything to do with DADT, and what Tammy saw as a glaring hypocrisy - Military keeping gays out while they did skits in drag. Comedy skits, btw, which Tammy doesn't seem to appreciate. But she brought up DADT.
3) And the notion that the loud voices protesting the repeal of DADT, that those conservatives, were most likely to have gay issues "under their bed" is a long time liberal, gay agenda talking point, and absolutely ludicrous.
Do Tammy and Sarah think that folks like Duncan Hunter and Duncan D. Hunter and Mike Pence and Chuck Yeager and Jeff Sessions and Ollie North and Gunny Sargeant Nick Popaditch and the Commadante of the Marine Corps - these were the loudest voices standing against DADT - have gay skeletons under their bed.
It's a major Eff-up on Palin's part even if she wasn't being as specific as Tammy was about DADT.
But you might want to note this as well. The media ran with this loudly - liberal blogs, MSM, and conservative media alike. It was a firestorm of stories on it. Yet why hasn't she clarified what she really meant. She has constantly been taking the media to task for getting their stories wrong for the last 2 years. This time, crickets.
Tammy's damage control is meaningless.
I was around for Reagan and Palin is Reagan in High Heels! She is better looking, but Reagan was not in his prime.
Palin is quicker in getting her words out than any politician in the last 50 years, this is a sign she says what she believes! Finally, someone who tells the Truth!
Some people seems to think a woman can’t run this country, that’s another reason why she needs to be the first woman President!
She would do a lot to hurt the men having sex with men lifestyle, Normal would be back in again! That’s probably the biggest reason that the anti Palin freepers keeping spurring out all the same negatives Reagan lived with, yes, our token liberal democrat Trolls and with their sick lifestyle!
Okay...I am at a loss.
What’s a “poofer”?
“Is a “poofer” the same as a “fluffer?”
I have no idea! lol
What’s a “fluffer”?
Assuming you are right, PA, I still don’t see a better candidate *with a real chance* to be nominated. If one surfaces, I’d support him or her. Hey, I supported Thompson in ‘08, but he lacked the gumption to attack McCain, and esp. since the socialist Huckster drew from Fred’s natural base, he floundered. I still believe that FT would have made GREAT leader. I’m afraid the other good candidates, DeMint, Bachmann and Cain, will cancel each other out. Hopefully, they won’t draw too many votes from Sarah, and thus allow a Romney or Daniels to prevail. Bob
Same as a poofter, without the t.
Gotcha!
Thank you!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.