Skip to comments.
Is Palin just a politician, after all?
WND ^
| 2/16/11
| Linda harvey
Posted on 02/15/2011 11:51:25 PM PST by pissant
Sarah Palin told reporters that she would have no problem with the porn lobby being cosponsors and holding respected seats at the table at last week's CPAC meeting. Nor does she have a problem with Planned Parenthood. After all, these are "different, diverse groups involved in political discourse" so why not allow them all to crowd in under the "conservative" umbrella?
Actually, she didn't say these things, but instead told Fox News "gay" groups had a right to be at CPAC. But, why not these others as well? Don't they fit her broad qualifications, as stated above? Why not allow anyone or any group, truly, as long as they decide to label themselves "conservative"? Who cares if Rachel Maddow shows up, saying she's a conservative? Hail to "conservatives" Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and Al Sharpton! Why not?
Isn't dialogue important?
Actually, no. When a group espouses a certain set of standards, there ought to be some "truth-in-labeling" involved. Are pro-lifers at NOW meetings? No, and for good reason. It's called integrity. Their presence would signal an endorsement of abortion. Attendance says, "I will listen to these people." But there are some points that are not open for discussion, not for people with strong convictions.
Discover what military personnel and decorated vets think of ending DADT in Whistleblower magazine's dramatic February issue, "DROPPING THE H-BOMB"
Why would any Christian conservative listen to guys who have sex with each other and are working diligently to silence those who tell them this might not be a great idea? With traditional conservatives, the GOProud homosexual group has zero credibility, yet Sarah has just given them quite a bit. She has made a big mistake, if she believes there's a legitimate "debate" that we can hold with sodomy advocates.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: cpac; dailykosposter; freepressforpalin; goproud; homosexualagenda; nocpac4sarah; palin; pissant4dailykos; pissant4fisters; pissant4obama; pissant4rinos; pissantpds; pissantscomingout; sarah10pissant0
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
FWIW.
1
posted on
02/15/2011 11:51:32 PM PST
by
pissant
To: pissant
2
posted on
02/16/2011 12:06:04 AM PST
by
Artcore
To: pissant
3
posted on
02/16/2011 12:09:50 AM PST
by
Berlin_Freeper
(The Left is the Antichrist.)
To: pissant
Pissant daily
messages PDS spam:
Blah, blah blah Palin stinks, blah, blah blah
Yawn
4
posted on
02/16/2011 12:10:00 AM PST
by
lewislynn
( What does the global warming movement and the Fairtax movement have in commom? Misinformation)
To: pissant
Is Palin just a politician, after all?Well duh!
[and this coming from a Palin fan]
5
posted on
02/16/2011 12:10:47 AM PST
by
Jeff Chandler
(Judas Iscariot - the first social justice advocate. John 12:3-6)
To: Berlin_Freeper
This gal apparently has a problem with CPAC cozying up with the poofers. Hence the attack on Palin, who may have said something dumb, but had zero responsibility for CPAC’s decision.
6
posted on
02/16/2011 12:18:35 AM PST
by
pissant
((Bachmann 2012 - Freepmail to get on/off PING list))
To: pissant
It’s David ‘Money’ Keene’s CPAC, which has always been a fake ‘conservative’, Washington approved steering organization to get in front of us cave dwelling ignorant conservatives and try to steer us to the moderate light.
7
posted on
02/16/2011 12:23:20 AM PST
by
Leisler
(Our debts are someone's profit. Follow the money, the vig.....)
To: pissant
Reminds me of a weird gathering for the family of a friend I attended.....
Some of the folks did not quite get along, mostly because one of them was a snake.
A particular relative clarified he had no problem with that "snake" being allowed to sit at the table, and he had no problem with that persons presence......
Everyone breathed a short sigh of relief, for a brief moment, before he continued on....."while he may have a seat at the table, and enjoy himself, I have no intention of being at that table with him."
The moral being, anyone may show up, it doesn't mean you have to do so also, or even, be a party to it.....
8
posted on
02/16/2011 12:24:20 AM PST
by
Sonny M
("oderint dum metuant")
To: pissant
“This gal apparently has a problem with CPAC cozying up with the poofers”
Link, please? I’ve seen the opposite. And, it’s “poofters”.
Actually, the direction that CPAC has taken in the last few years is a direction I had hoped they wouldn’t go.
Ron Paul?
9
posted on
02/16/2011 12:24:54 AM PST
by
dixiechick2000
("First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." - Gandhi)
To: Leisler
10
posted on
02/16/2011 12:25:36 AM PST
by
dixiechick2000
("First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." - Gandhi)
To: Jeff Chandler
Palin is a politician, and yes, she is treading water on this, because the Establishment is totally in the tank for the gay rights people, and she has to make some choices.
11
posted on
02/16/2011 12:26:28 AM PST
by
RobbyS
(Pray with the suffering souls.)
To: dixiechick2000
Her entire article is her scolding Palin for agreeing with CPAC. The “link” you want is THIS article.
And it’s poofers up here, not poofters.
12
posted on
02/16/2011 12:35:59 AM PST
by
pissant
((Bachmann 2012 - Freepmail to get on/off PING list))
To: pissant
Here's how Palin ranks. You PDS people are in the minority; actually several different minorities.
http://spectator.org/polls/2012-feb-straw-poll/results
Thank you for your interest. The latest round of voting in The American Spectator's 2012 GOP Straw Poll has CLOSED. We'll be polling users again at the beginning of March. Check back then.
Sarah Palin |
45.85% |
Herman Cain |
7.13% |
Mitch Daniels |
6.00% |
Ron Paul |
5.89% |
Chris Christie |
5.77% |
Other |
4.87% |
Jim DeMint |
3.55% |
Mike Huckabee |
3.12% |
Mitt Romney |
2.85% |
Newt Gingrich |
2.38% |
Paul Ryan |
2.14% |
Tim Pawlenty |
1.72% |
Michele Bachmann |
1.60% |
Mike Pence |
1.44% |
Haley Barbour |
1.17% |
Rick Santorum |
0.97% |
Rand Paul |
0.94% |
Marco Rubio |
0.74% |
Rick Perry |
0.74% |
John Thune |
0.66% |
Gary Johnson |
0.47% |
13
posted on
02/16/2011 12:41:46 AM PST
by
meadsjn
(Sarah 2012, or sooner)
To: pissant
yes, you are a poofer. Your PDS is alive and well...
Pissant - Daily Troll Thread # 3417 and still losing his mind more every day! Sarah Palin is living rent free, thanks!!!
Elect Sarah Palin for President 2012
Re-Elect President Sarah Palin 2016
14
posted on
02/16/2011 12:42:09 AM PST
by
WVKayaker
(Faith makes the discords of the present become the harmonies of the future - Robert Collyer)
To: dixiechick2000
Is a “poofer” the same as a “fluffer?”
15
posted on
02/16/2011 12:42:43 AM PST
by
Cobra64
To: RobbyS
She made a choice. She didn’t attend. This is a free country and if people want to get together and talk about politics, have at it. They didn’t crash the party. They were invited. She was invited to address them and she said no. I don’t see where she endorsed their perversion at all.
When you are invited to an event and you decide not to go, you are not obligated to say why you’re not going. In this case she did say that she was busy with other activities.
Gays at CPAC is one of the least problems for Palin attending. The major problem is that the event is rigged against conservatives. The Paulites and Romneybots have taken it over. Why waste your time?
To: pissant
the fact that cpac allow democrat donald trump and socialist mitt romney there, ppl should not be complaining about goproud
17
posted on
02/16/2011 12:43:58 AM PST
by
4rcane
To: meadsjn
Man, I bet she cruises to the nomination with similar numbers. Just like Ron Paul will crush the competition based on CPACs numbers and Huckabee will win it all based on a poll of southern baptists.
18
posted on
02/16/2011 12:44:26 AM PST
by
pissant
((Bachmann 2012 - Freepmail to get on/off PING list))
To: pissant
“Actually, she didn’t say these things..”
“Actually, she didn’t say these things..”
“Actually, she didn’t say these things..”
“Actually, she didn’t say these things..”
“Actually, she didn’t say these things..”
Duh.
Another world nut daily exclusive? These critters are becoming as bad as media madders.
19
posted on
02/16/2011 12:51:13 AM PST
by
MestaMachine
(Note: I do NOT capitalize anything I don't respect...like obama and/or islam..)
To: meadsjn
20
posted on
02/16/2011 12:52:39 AM PST
by
MestaMachine
(Note: I do NOT capitalize anything I don't respect...like obama and/or islam..)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson