Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MindBender26

Employers that put employees in dangerous situations without regard to their particular vulnerability and without adequete security should be finacialy liable for incidents of this type.

If I have an employee that works in a hazardous location, I am not able to avoid damages by saying the employee was a roofer, they shouldn’t have fallen or if they suffered injury they understood the risk.


26 posted on 02/15/2011 1:32:42 PM PST by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: KC Burke

On the other hand, all of this was common sense. This is the Middle East we’re talking about here and dealing with Arabs.


29 posted on 02/15/2011 1:34:45 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: KC Burke
Employers that put employees in dangerous situations without regard to their particular vulnerability and without adequete security should be finacialy liable for incidents of this type.

While I agree with you, we live in a PC culture now where to "protect women" is to discriminate against them.

We are putting women in similar situations in the military. It is a bad idea. How many women will be raped in these unstable areas before we wise up?

205 posted on 02/15/2011 4:31:43 PM PST by SteamShovel ("Does the noise in my head bother you?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson