Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Parents blame toddler's death on tainted alcohol wipes
MSNBC ^ | 2/15/2011 8:21:03 AM ET | By JoNel Aleccia

Posted on 02/15/2011 10:22:10 AM PST by Red Badger

Millions of pads, swabs recalled because of same bacteria that killed 2-year-old boy

The parents of a 2-year-old Houston boy who died from a rare infection are suing makers of recalled alcohol prep products, claiming contaminated wipes and swabs transmitted bacteria that caused his fatal case of meningitis.

Sandra and Shanoop Kothari say their lively, dark-eyed toddler, Harrison, was recovering just fine from surgery to remove a benign cyst from near his brain and spinal cord last fall. But the day before he was set to be discharged after a week's stay, he developed a sudden and severe infection that worsened rapidly, causing multi-organ failure that led to Harrison’s death on Dec. 1, 2010.

Cultures showed he succumbed to acute bacterial meningitis caused by Bacillus cereus, bacteria typically found in rare food poisoning outbreaks, but not in hospital infections.

“They had no explanation as to how he contracted it,” said Sandra Kothari, 37, Harrison’s mother. “They know it’s rare in the hospital.”

Rare bacteria detected For more than a month, the family grieved without knowing the cause of their loss. Then, on Jan. 5, a relative saw a notice posted online by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. All lots of alcohol prep wipes, perhaps tens of millions of swabs and pads manufactured by the Triad Group, a Wisconsin medical product supplier, were being recalled.

The reason? Potential contamination with Bacillus cereus.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alcohol; pads; recall; swabs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Sandra and Shanoop Kothari of Houston hold a photo of their two children, Hannah and Harrison. After a routine surgery for a benign cyst, Harrison Kothari, 2, died last year of bacterial meningitis caused by Bacillus cereus, a rare bacterium that was later linked to the recall of millions of alcohol prep wipes.

1 posted on 02/15/2011 10:22:21 AM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Wow, this is really bad. How did that much bacteria survive on the alcohol wipes? I have some in my medicine cabinet - I never knew any were recalled. I am so very sorry for this family. I hope everyone checks their supply and throws out anything tainted.

We are sitting ducks for poorly prepared medical stuff, especially these things that Are used post surgery when we are weak and have open wounds.


2 posted on 02/15/2011 10:28:32 AM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Extremely sorry for their loss, but I didn’t know that bacteria could live in alcohol. Isn’t alcohol an antiseptic?


3 posted on 02/15/2011 10:30:23 AM PST by ReverendJames (Only A Painter Or A Liberal Can Change Black To White)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

I was wondering the same thing. I thought alcohol killed everything. I also wonder if they will ever answer the question of how the contamination happened in the first place.


4 posted on 02/15/2011 10:31:30 AM PST by RoseyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

People looking for a reason to something unexplainable happening. I understand their pain, but sometime bad things happen without specific cause.


5 posted on 02/15/2011 10:34:14 AM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoseyT

“....I thought alcohol killed everything....”

Nope, it doesn’t. I think I’ll research this. My hospital is heavy into the hand sanitizer stuff; it is part of protocol as a time saver. It is not as effective as good hand washing.


6 posted on 02/15/2011 10:36:31 AM PST by Islander7 (There is no septic system so vile, so filthy, the left won't drink from to further their agenda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RoseyT

The alcohol may not kill everything, and the stuff that survives is much more virulent.


7 posted on 02/15/2011 10:37:49 AM PST by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

“People looking for a reason to something unexplainable happening. I understand their pain, but sometime bad things happen without specific cause.”

Read the story; the baby died from a bacteria found in the wipes. A bacteria not normally found in hospitals. Also a bacteria for which the wipes were being recalled.

Unfortunately a lawsuit won’t bring their baby back.


8 posted on 02/15/2011 10:38:29 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ReverendJames

Alcohol doesn’t kill everything...............


9 posted on 02/15/2011 10:38:58 AM PST by Red Badger (Want to be surprised? Google your own name. Want to have fun? Google your friend's names.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

Wrong answer. There is a specific cause. The question is how was this child exposed to that cause? If the exposure is due to a fault in a product or its misuse, then there is a party responsible for the death.


10 posted on 02/15/2011 10:41:53 AM PST by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All
This has been known for a while.

From 1999

Nosocomial pseudoepidemic caused by Bacillus cereus traced to contaminated ethyl alcohol from a liquor factory.

Abstract
From September 1990 to October 1990, 15 patients who were admitted to four different departments of the National Taiwan University Hospital, including nine patients in the emergency department, three in the hematology/oncology ward, two in the surgical intensive care unit, and one in a pediatric ward, were found to have positive blood (14 patients) or pleural effusion (1 patient) cultures for Bacillus cereus. After extensive surveillance cultures, 19 additional isolates of B. cereus were recovered from 70% ethyl alcohol that had been used as a skin disinfectant (14 isolates from different locations in the hospital) and from 95% ethyl alcohol (5 isolates from five alcohol tanks in the pharmacy department), and 10 isolates were recovered from 95% ethyl alcohol from the factory which supplied the alcohol to the hospital. In addition to these 44 isolates of B. cereus, 12 epidemiologically unrelated B. cereus isolates, one Bacillus sphaericus isolate from a blood specimen from a patient seen in May 1990, and two B. sphaericus isolates from 95% alcohol in the liquor factory were also studied for their microbiological relatedness. Among these isolates, antibiotypes were determined by using the disk diffusion method and the E test, biotypes were created with the results of the Vitek Bacillus Biochemical Card test, and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) patterns were generated by arbitrarily primed PCR. Two clones of the 15 B. cereus isolates recovered from patients were identified (clone A from 2 patients and clone B from 13 patients), and all 29 isolates of B. cereus recovered from 70 or 95% ethyl alcohol in the hospital or in the factory belonged to clone B. The antibiotype and RAPD pattern of the B. sphaericus isolate from the patient were different from those of isolates from the factory. Our data show that the pseudoepidemic was caused by a clone (clone B) of B. cereus from contaminated 70% ethyl alcohol used in the hospital, which we successfully traced to preexisting contaminated 95% ethyl alcohol from the supplier, and by another clone (clone A) without an identifiable source.

11 posted on 02/15/2011 10:44:12 AM PST by Islander7 (There is no septic system so vile, so filthy, the left won't drink from to further their agenda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

I would think that a match between the rare bacteria that killed the child and the rare bacteria that was in the contaminated swabs could be DNA tested to see if they are the same.............


12 posted on 02/15/2011 10:47:57 AM PST by Red Badger (Want to be surprised? Google your own name. Want to have fun? Google your friend's names.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

This particular bacteria is a spore reproducer, more like a fungus than an animal or plant. That is why alcohol didn’t kill it...........


13 posted on 02/15/2011 10:49:33 AM PST by Red Badger (Want to be surprised? Google your own name. Want to have fun? Google your friend's names.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ReverendJames
Bacillus species can form spores (anthrax is one that can survive for decades) and alcohol kills the growing, dividing bacteria, not the spores. When the spores get into favorable conditions, they start growing again.

Alcohol won't kill Clostridium spores either, that cause C. diff. diarrhea, or botulism, or tetanus.

14 posted on 02/15/2011 10:50:05 AM PST by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

Note the swabs and pads, which are NOT soaked in alcohol, are part of the recall along with the wipes.

A food poison-infected worker (with septic hands) loading a packaging machine is a possible vector for the bacteria to contaminate SOME of the ‘sterile’ materials, necessitating a total recall.

It is a spore forming bacteria, so if the sterilizer didn’t run hot enough or long enough to kill the spores, that is another vector. Alcohol for sure kills the bacteria, but perhaps not all the spores, and perhaps the dry pads and swaps were spore-contaminated.

B. cereus is quite common in the environment. B. cereus is a gut bacteria for virtually all of us, meaning that if you cultured what grows normally in your intestines, only the rare person would not have ANY of these in their gut. The problem for this young fellow is that his surgical wound became infected. And due to the nature of the surgery it progressed to meningitis.

Lastly, this bacterium is a common soil bacteria. Pets, siblings, parents and friends are ALSO a likely source of contamination.


15 posted on 02/15/2011 10:54:09 AM PST by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stormer

Last month they threw out all of our alcohol wipes and replaced them with another brand due to bacteria. My guess is he could have been exposed when they used it to clean a hep well before flushing it or using it to push meds.


16 posted on 02/15/2011 10:54:56 AM PST by linn37 ( "The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: heartwood; Red Badger

Well there goes that theory. So the bacteria that killed that kid lived in alcohol? Will have to rethink my first aid kit. Maybe some diluted bleach instead? On injuries?


17 posted on 02/15/2011 10:56:48 AM PST by ReverendJames (Only A Painter Or A Liberal Can Change Black To White)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ReverendJames
Extremely sorry for their loss, but I didn’t know that bacteria could live in alcohol. Isn’t alcohol an antiseptic?

Alcohol does not kill everything. One alcohol-resistant organism that comes to mind is Cryptosporidium. It is also bleach-resistant. It is a common cause of diarrhea among children (its resistant properties make it difficult to kill in day care settings). Crypto is killed by hydrogen peroxide.

18 posted on 02/15/2011 11:04:08 AM PST by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: ReverendJames

This was a RARE bacteria, not normally encountered in everyday life, even in a hospital.
Alcohol is very good for killing common bacteria, in a 60-70% dilution with water.
Hydrogen peroxide is too.....


20 posted on 02/15/2011 11:07:52 AM PST by Red Badger (Want to be surprised? Google your own name. Want to have fun? Google your friend's names.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson