Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans Rebuke Effort to Defund Health Care Law (Here they go again! Defund it NOW!)
Fox News ^ | 2/15/2011 | Chad Pergram |

Posted on 02/15/2011 4:06:52 AM PST by tobyhill

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and defenders of the health care reform law unearthed an unexpected and temporary ally Monday night: Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC).

Politics makes strange bedfellows. But few bunking arrangements are stranger than this.

To be clear, there aren't many in Congress who have more antipathy for the health care law than Foxx. In fact, at a meeting of the House Rules Committee Monday night, Foxx could barely hide her contempt for the health law.

"It is an abomination that this bill was passed," scoffed Foxx.

But for a few moments, Foxx, and all seven of her Republican colleagues on the Rules Committee formed a short-term vanguard to preserve the touchstone of the Democrats' legislative agenda last year.

Here's what's going on:

On Tuesday, the House plans to debate a bill to fund the government through September. Republicans aim to use the measure to pare at least $100 billion in spending out of this year's budget.

There is no provision more onerous to conservatives than the health law. So if the GOP is set to cut spending, why not shave the money set aside to implement the health law, too?

Rep. Steve King (R-IA) planned to do just that, which would in turn cripple all government operations devoted to executing the health law. In other words, if there's no money, the government can't carry out the policy.

And that's when King ran into a buzz saw run by Virginia Foxx and the rest of the Republicans on the House Rules Committee.

All of those Republicans want to upend the health care law just as much as King does. But not at the expense of corrupting House rules that govern how to handle the spending measure on the floor.

(Excerpt) Read more at politics.blogs.foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: CarmichaelPatriot
Two wrongs don't make a right.

How about one wrong vs. thousands of wrongs from the past four years? Would that be okay?

Your comment describes exactly why we continue to lose the battle. If it takes one wrong to stop the communism, I'm all for it!

41 posted on 02/15/2011 6:41:41 AM PST by Just A Nobody ( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EBH
I decided to read through the posts before commenting and it took 17 posts to get to the first thing I thought of on reading the headline.

The Courts have ruled this healthcare monstrosity unConstitutional.

This should be the one and only argument used to defund this "obamanation."

42 posted on 02/15/2011 6:53:19 AM PST by Just A Nobody ( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Principled; All

Called Boehner’s office this morning in addition to my congressman who is against funding ObotulismCare. Go raise hell.


43 posted on 02/15/2011 7:43:50 AM PST by DarthVader (That which supports Barack Hussein Obama must be sterilized and there are NO exceptions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mongrel
That’s a great argument. Simply say that since the Administration is ignoring the judge’s ruling and moving ahead with implementation, the House will not move ahead with funding until the Administration receives relief from the courts to move ahead with implementation. It draws attention to the illegality of what they are doing, and forces their hand in moving the case along the appeals process.

The absolute stupidity of the rules committee is astounding. Could they be anymore willfully ignorant?

You can't fund what has been ruled unConstitutional. It can't even be in the budget bill.

44 posted on 02/15/2011 8:16:07 AM PST by EBH ( Whether you eat your bread or see it vanish into a looter's stomach, is an absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: CarmichaelPatriot

It is DOA.

It has been ruled on by the courts as illegal. It can’t even be in the budget bill.

Placing it in the budget bill and passing the bill essentially passes the legislation again.


45 posted on 02/15/2011 8:18:19 AM PST by EBH ( Whether you eat your bread or see it vanish into a looter's stomach, is an absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Indeed they have been sent there with this as the most important piece of business to be dealt with. Speaker Boehner might well give up his post if he can’t at least handle a large majority as well as Pelosi did. I wrote specifically to Boehner, Foxx and the Rules Committee and then sent Boehner’s note (included here) to each of the COS of most Representives. If any one would like to have CSV files of these addresses, let me know in some private way.
Let’s flood the offices. Spread this out on the net.

(Dear Speaker Boehner:

I was shocked to hear today that YOU are considering moving a Continuing Resolution under current house rules. I know that you are aware that this in essence gives Nancy Pelosi, under whom the current Continuing Resolution was forced upon us, control of the budget for the first year of the term in which Republicans hold a sizeable majority. I pray that I will hear rapidly from your office that this is a scurrilous untruth.

The news reports that YOU refuse to allow the amendment rules to be changed so that Obamacare, which now has been found to be UNCONSTITUTIONAL in its entirety, can be defunded. The reason given was that Ms. Pelosi had done that and YOU wish to play on a higher spiritual plane. Changing the rule, even for a short time, is legitimate! Your false display of “better than thou” only suggests that YOU are not up to the task of Speaker, IF this is the case.

Of course this then begs the question of how do you intend to introduce amendments to reduce the spending in this current year by $100 Billion, without changing the rule? You and the republicans that we worked so hard to elect are doing an OBAMA - you have reneged on your campaign promises.

I urge you, even at the risk of Government Shutdown, that you show the courage to do what you promised and were elected to do. Pass the amendment to the rule AND pass the Continuing Resolution for a TW0 month period with the amendment to the resolution to defund OBAMACARE.

If this be true, I am much disappointed in YOU personally and the Republicans that supported this point of view. If the news is faulty, leading to a misunderstanding, then I apologize and offer continuing support.

Show me by DEEDS and not only WORDS.)

Let us hold their feet to the fire as the next primary is only 21 months away and our memory is at least as good as that.


46 posted on 02/15/2011 8:18:30 AM PST by francesco525 (NO MORE BUSINESS AS USUAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH
You're right which is why this is more evidence the GOP has no plans to do anything with Obamacare, except fund it. To defund is merely not to allocate money for it but some RINOs seem hellbent on leaving money in the budget for it.
47 posted on 02/15/2011 8:28:47 AM PST by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: EBH
“House rules prohibit lawmakers from “legislating” on a spending bill, such as curbing funds for health care.”

The GOP is trying to bamboozle us again by claiming that because of the House rules they must fund Obamacare and then when they get called out on it they use the rules as a convenient excuse despite the Courts already ruling it unconstitutional.

48 posted on 02/15/2011 8:37:41 AM PST by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: preamble
"Why are they funding an unconstitutional law?"
Quick and easy answer............because they can...there are no penalties to the ruling class for failure to follow the constitution...why????read my tagline, and everything will become crystal clear............
49 posted on 02/15/2011 10:23:47 AM PST by joe fonebone (The House has oversight of the Judiciary...why are the rogue judges not being impeached?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Rep. Virginia Foxx:

Phone: (202) 225-2071
Fax: (202) 225-2995

District offices:

Clemmons, NC
Phone: (336) 778-0211
Toll Free: 1-(866) 677-8968
Fax: (336) 778-2290

Boone, NC
Phone: (828) 265-0240
Fax: (828) 265-0390


50 posted on 02/15/2011 12:03:04 PM PST by B Knotts (Just another Tenther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

bookmark


51 posted on 02/15/2011 3:12:23 PM PST by nutmeg (The 111th Congress: Worst. Congress. Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson