Skip to comments.
‘A weapon of mass destruction was found in the U.S.’: Shock confession of Customs officer
Mail Online (www.dailymail.co.uk) ^
| 2-11-2011
| David Gardner
Posted on 02/14/2011 9:16:42 AM PST by TexasTomT
port official has admitted that a 'weapon of mass effect' has been found by 'partner agencies' in the U.S., raising major questions over a possible government cover-up.
The disturbing revelation came in an interview with San Diego's assistant port director screened by a television channel in the city.
The Customs and Border Protection Department tried to dampen speculation over his remarks
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1356645/A-weapon-mass-destruction-U-S--Shock-confession-Customs-officer.html#ixzz1DvGr4mv3
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alteredtitle; braking; firstpost; noob; postedseveraltimes; wmd; wmds
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
To: TexasTomT
I read the transcript which mentions dirty bombs, which the stupid media and govt conflate with atomic bombs. Dirty bombs are nothing in comparison, so I would not panic yet.
41
posted on
02/14/2011 10:02:51 AM PST
by
PghBaldy
(Like the Ft Hood Killer, James Earl Ray was just stressed when he killed MLK Jr.)
To: TexasTomT
42
posted on
02/14/2011 10:05:41 AM PST
by
PMAS
To: TexasTomT
43
posted on
02/14/2011 10:05:41 AM PST
by
PMAS
To: TexasTomT
44
posted on
02/14/2011 10:05:48 AM PST
by
PMAS
To: PMAS
....dash, dash, dash....
45
posted on
02/14/2011 10:06:45 AM PST
by
cyberaxe
(....Uuuummpphhhh.....)
To: HushTX
Take everything with a grain of salt. ALL sources. Daily Mail or otherwise. Just curious as to why? I mean isn't there a video of this interview?
46
posted on
02/14/2011 10:12:34 AM PST
by
justice14
("stand up defend or lay down and die")
To: justice14
I’m just reminding folks that we need to be critical of every source, lest we become lazy and swallow the Media’s bait hook, line and sinker.
47
posted on
02/14/2011 10:18:26 AM PST
by
HushTX
(If the best defense is a good offense, it's a good thing I'm really offensive.)
To: caver
Here is a picture of the WMD is question.
48
posted on
02/14/2011 10:22:14 AM PST
by
KC_Lion
(America is on the Brink of War with its self, and no one seams to notice or care)
To: HushTX
Im just reminding folks that we need to be critical of every source, lest we become lazy and swallow the Medias bait hook, line and sinker. Ok. Understandable.
49
posted on
02/14/2011 10:24:03 AM PST
by
justice14
("stand up defend or lay down and die")
To: TexasTomT
Ofcourse they are smuggling in WMD. Anyone that thinks they haven’t , have not been paying attention to current events.
Jan the Queen of Idiot Obamabots, has been turning a blind eye to National Security when it come to the borders.
When BC,Local Sheriffs etc are considered the “enemy” when they try to stop the invasion, we have a problem.
I think Jan made her warning about a 9-11 type attack, because she KNOWS the enemy has already smuggled in something.
B***H
50
posted on
02/14/2011 10:24:56 AM PST
by
Marty62
(Marty 60)
To: HushTX
I agree.
The Hollywood/entertainment MSM, our government, and the “powers that be (you define it)” have learned to play the American masses like a fiddle. We need to be skeptical, cynical and critical of everything.
51
posted on
02/14/2011 10:28:17 AM PST
by
apoliticalone
(US conservatism does not equal multi-national corporatism)
To: apoliticalone
Look at what’s happening in a lot of churches...
That’s another good example.
52
posted on
02/14/2011 10:31:44 AM PST
by
HushTX
(If the best defense is a good offense, it's a good thing I'm really offensive.)
To: 444Flyer
The Channel 10 report has a “groaner” tag lines. The reporter refers to a future story that will examine the “fallout” of their investigation. Perhaps “impact” or “outcome” would have been a better choice.
53
posted on
02/14/2011 10:38:35 AM PST
by
ArmstedFragg
(hoaxy dopey changey)
To: 444Flyer
The Channel 10 report has a “groaner” tag line. The reporter refers to a future story that will examine the “fallout” of their investigation. Perhaps “impact” or “outcome” would have been a better choice.
54
posted on
02/14/2011 10:39:04 AM PST
by
ArmstedFragg
(hoaxy dopey changey)
To: theDentist
Yep, what did they know and when?
55
posted on
02/14/2011 10:54:48 AM PST
by
2001convSVT
(That Beck guy was right about gold, too.)
To: TexasTomT
56
posted on
02/14/2011 10:56:40 AM PST
by
A.A. Cunningham
(Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
To: TexasTomT
Obviously the Republicans’ failed to pass the Patriot Act renewal...and caused all this.../s
57
posted on
02/14/2011 11:00:37 AM PST
by
mo
("If you understand, no explanation is needed; if you do not, no explanation is possible")
To: caver
“This is by a poster that just signed up today.”
I signed up just a few days before you but even I know to look at the source before I throw out spurious comments.
58
posted on
02/14/2011 11:09:37 AM PST
by
TheCause
("that these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States")
To: LibLieSlayer
It’s the first I’ve seen of it. I’ll look further into it. You are right though, we are lied to every day.
59
posted on
02/14/2011 11:18:02 AM PST
by
caver
(Obama: Home of the Whopper)
To: TexasTomT
When I think of Nuke and San Diego, I immediately think of the TV Show Babylon 5.
In the show they make vague references on several occasions of the “Nuking of San Diego”.
Fact Following Fiction?
60
posted on
02/14/2011 11:21:36 AM PST
by
GraceG
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson