Posted on 02/14/2011 8:00:02 AM PST by MindBender26
he needs to be removed NOW not 2012
Should we really surprised to read this coming from a non-American, Muslim, Marxist, impostor-in-chief with the Secret Service code name of Renegade?
Obastard really is a treasonous POS...
When the Islamic Jihadists understand that we may not always follow the rules they are learning from our media we may have an advantage in the field.
Obama needs to be impeached NOW, tried for treason NOW and suffer the consequences for treason NOW.
Impeach now.
The book isn’t new, I read it some time ago.
Definitely a worthy read.
They haven’t invented the curse words to describe this man yet.
he needs to be removed NOW not 2012
2012 may be too late...
They havent invented the curse words to describe this man yet.
Any derivation of EVIL will do.
I personally am unable to even think his name without mentally adding expletives.
In the case of the democrat party, none of the cute little (dumocrat) titles help. Finally, I realized that you can't be more descriptive than to simply write their name, no capitalization. In and of itself, it is an expletive.
In both cases, it helps to remember that "evil" is a fitting adjective.
I don’t know how anyone can support him knowing this information.
I don’t know how anyone can support him knowing this information.
I saw an aticle yesterday about Obummer being caught in a homosexual and drug encounter, and in it they described him with havingbad teeth.
there was an accompnaying article that showeed him with crooked teeth like 8-10 years ago- and he has certainly had them fixed since then.
But the original teeth and look on his face was so evil it came me the willies.
I think he is an infiltraitor from the muslim brotherhood, born in Kenya, and should be impeached and tried for treason.
**************************
Time to start posting a link to Horowitz's book...at Amazon:
Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam And the American Left [Paperback]
****************EXCERPT ********************************
Vastly Illuminating, September 25, 2004>
I had long wondered why people on the Left had the propensity to speak more positively about people who would slit their throats than they do about their own country, which affords them more freedom and opportunity than anywhere else. David Horowitz has answered that question thoroughly and convincingly in his Unholy Alliance. Where I felt bewildered and confused, I now feel crystal clear. Unholy Alliance is such a great book.
It begins with the leftist movements at the beginning of the 20th Century, and works its way up to the present day, exploring the anti-American attitude of these movements in detail. Horowitz shows that the enemies of the US back then are largely the same group today, operating under the same misperceptions, making the same mistakes, and pursuing the same impossible utopia.
Individual chapters are included on the Patriot Act (I was persuaded that it is a GOOD thing); the democratic flip-flop on Iraq once G.W. Bush implemented what they agreed with Clinton needed to be done; the driving components of the current anti-war movement; as well as chapters on individual personalities who are major spokespeople of the Left. Horowitz covers a lot of ground, and he covers it concisely and clearly. Unholy Alliance is richly informative without ever being boring or plodding.
This book is so illuminating that I simply cannot do justice to it here. I love people who reason so clearly that they help me get my own reasoning clear. Horowitz is just that type of person! In the terrain of mindless clichés (no-blood-for-oil, etc.), he is a breath of real fresh air.
To be treasonous, he'd have to be an American and that seriously in question.
What we know about this president's actions is chilling enough. What we don't know--and that's probably 90% of it--is terrifying.
People who blindly object to enhanced interrogation or even torture are using soft sentimentality rather than true morality. The ones who want to weaken us compare it to the Spanish Inquisition, Nazi death camps or Vietnam War treatment of POWs.
When used to force a confession of past crimes, torture is truly evil and wrong. It has been used by despots throughout history to gain evidence to justify killing their enemies.
This is entirely different than aggressive interrogation used to obtain intelligence about future plans for murder, bombings and terror attacks. I, for one, have little trouble trading one person’s pain and or discomfort to prevent the death of hundreds or thousands. It is gong too far to permanently injure or maim the people being questioned. But effective fear of the same in order to prevent death of innocents is a fair trade off. In order to prevent abuse, it would be fair to say that any information gained from such techniques could not be used for criminal prosecution of the one questioned.
These are just some of my thoughts on the matter. Considering what is at stake, our country needs to have an in depth debate about this subject. We need to sort through all the nasty, ugly moral issues and come to a workable set of behaviors. To just throw up our hands and eliminate any aggressive interrogation, in light of who our enemy is, is the equivalent of unconditional surrender. But it is not surrendering ourselves to enslavement but surrendering our children to enslavement. That is cowardice in the extreme.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.