Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: george76

I think the difference between wind and solar is that solar has a clear path to efficency ratios that will make it an extremely viable energy player, even if it’s 10 or 20 years out from now.


26 posted on 02/13/2011 6:54:25 PM PST by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Almondjoy

Canada does not get much sunshine. It has very few deserts, just a couple of very small thingys.


27 posted on 02/13/2011 8:20:05 PM PST by Candor7 (Obama . fascist info..http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Almondjoy

“I think the difference between wind and solar is that solar has a clear path to efficency ratios that will make it an extremely viable energy player, even if it’s 10 or 20 years out from now.”

I remain highly skeptical about your assertion.Solar power is not economically viable today except in some offgrid locations. I see little possibility beyond fundamental scientific and engineering breakthroughs that it will be viable in 10 or 20 years.


28 posted on 02/13/2011 8:48:36 PM PST by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson