Replies

And it's a great commentary on the sad state of conservative affairs that they are considered by some to be unknown or that they are against Ron Paul's views, which are right in line with the founding of the organizations.

You've got that right, Gondring.

But what can you expect when the number of people calling themselves "conservative" is so much greater than it was 40-50 years ago. The fringe has been pushed toward the middle and there's much less unanimity on policy (or for that matter, principles) than existed when YAF was founded.

An even more dramatic shift occurred within ISI, once known as the Intercollegiate Society of Individualists. It started out as an academic version of YAF, stressing scholarship in matters of importance to understanding the relationship we have with our government. One of ISI's founders, besides WFB, was Frank Chodorov who would place high on the pantheon of libertarian/classical liberal writers.

These days, ISI might as well be a collegiate adjunct of the Heritage Foundation.

It is refreshing to find someone who is familiar with these very important points and shifts in the history of conservativism and conservative organizations.

I think that ISI has too many internal problems for my liking, but I also see that it hasn't entirely moved away from its roots. Still, "These days, ISI might as well be a collegiate adjunct of the Heritage Foundation." sure caught my attention. Great line!