Replies

You criticized the study and the conclusions that came from the study, not the story. Now that I have caught you and pointed out that you haven't even read the study, and hence can't make ANY conclusions from the available data, you retreated to the very dubious claim that you were only criticizing "the story." While you did start out with "I hate stories like this..." It is pretty obvious that your problem was with the conclusions. Without looking at the study itself, how are you in any position to make any conclusion at all? You seem to have latched onto "I DESPERATELY WANT TO BELIEVE THAT ALL TEENZ HAVE TEH SEX" and then backed that premise out to make assumptions about data that you haven't seen. Then you degenerated into projection and name calling when you got called on it. I know you like to think that you are some sort of sophisticated intellectual, but when you resort to throwing out lines like: "I know the DNC has a habit of attacking anyone who questions a talking point (Palin, Beck, Limbaugh, Coulter, ect) and that is EXACTLY what you are doing", you are anything but. Oh NOEZ... I IZ DA DNC!!! ITZ A CONSPIWACY!!!!

Again ... sources please. Some facts would be nice.

Some sanity woud be nice too.

Why would I want teens having sex? Why would I want unwanted babies born to unwed mothers? Why would I want more abortions?

I question the story, as it was fluff.

So, please post your facts, your sources. I suspect you have nothing - - and you are proving my suspicions correct.

Sources?