Now you are spewing a bunch of ad hominems, (and still projecting) simply because I pointed out that you haven’t even seen the study (which you now admit.)
So in other words, all those broad accusations were based on a couple paragraph news summary of a 91 page study that you hadn’t actually read.
So we don’t have to take anything you say seriously.
“Now you are spewing a bunch of ad hominems...”
And that’s supposed to be your territory, right?
You’re funny in an ironic kind of way.
That’s why I’m criticizing the story.
How long is your attention span?
The story did not link to the study, the story simply gave some findings that sound very dubious - and I question them.
Just like Obamacare, Global Warming, Off-shore drilling, ANWAR, Toyota uncontrolled acceleration, ect.
And you throwing out the ‘projecting’ thing without an iota of effort on your part.... put the souce there to see.
Why do you think this study has any basis on fact?
Why do you believe it?
What are the conditions fo the study?
Put up some facts. I’ve presented my critique’ ... defend the story - don’t attack me. I know the DNC has a habit of attacking anyone who questions a talking point (Palin, Beck, Limbaugh, Coulter, ect) and that is EXACTLY what you are doing.
Answer the questions.... present some facts. Or are your projecting ‘Wishful thinking’?
Facts please, sources please.