I think you are the one projecting. You ask me what's wrong, I tell you. You attack me by saying that ALL social sciences's must be invalid. I correct you by saying that there are proceedures. Youa attack me again and say that I must prove my criticism - I point out that it is the mission of the publisher to defend their article with fact.
Now, I'm the one projecting? If you read the posts - you will see that YOU have been accused of projecting by almost everone who has responded to you, and it's quite obvious you are.
Can you provide ANYTHING - and I'll be quite lenient as to what 'ANYTHING' means - ANYTHING to support that this study has any validity?
This study could have concluded the existance of the Easter Bunny, with the evidence they provided. There is NOTHING there, other than some 'findings'.
As such, those findings are meaningless - can you prove otherwise? It's not projecting ... it's called 'critical thinking'.
You do not know me, you have no idea what church I belong to, yet you are PROJECTING your insecurities on to me. I have defended my point - you have brought absolutely nothing but attacks, challenges and now you are projecting your insecurities on to me. Grow up.
Did you even look at the actual study? Or just the press release of the study? So do you even have an actual basis for making any complaint about the data at all, or are you really just complaining about the news story as linked?
You obviously don’t like the conclusion, because it seems conflicts with your world-view, but I doubt that you actually looked at the study, for you didn’t point to specifics, but rather made very broad generalizations.
And you are still projecting in your responses. It’s pretty funny too.