Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hodar

Ok. So you discount every single social science study that relies on self-reporting data. This would include the “studies” that purport to show that same-sex households are just as good as opposite-sex households, “studies” that show inordinate numbers of youth engage in sexually promiscuous activity, and “studies” that purport to show the ineffectiveness of drug education?

In essence, nothing in social science is good today, right? You can’t pick and choose what you like from such and discard the rest, right?


26 posted on 02/10/2011 1:33:01 PM PST by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: freedomwarrior998

Please stop putting words in my mouth. I show you that level of respect, I expect the same in return.

When a group (ANY GROUP) makes a claim, they should have some method of supporting that claim.

No age range was given, no double-blind test, no sampling across genders ... I expect better data gathering from a college level sophmore than what I saw in this report. And your typical collegel sophmore doesn’t get his results published for public dissemination.

That’s why the numbers given not only defy reality, they defy any reasonable assumption.

The church is trying to push an agenda; and deliberately skewing their suspect data to push their agenda.

It’s wrong when Gov’t publishes bad data, it’s doubly wrong when an institution that is ALLEGEDLY based on telling the truth - tells a bold-faced lie.

When I see a liar, don’t expect me to not challenge him.


28 posted on 02/10/2011 2:07:39 PM PST by Hodar (Who needs laws .... when this "feels" so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson