Skip to comments.
Palin: No 'problem' with gay group at CPAC
The Hill ^
| 10 Feb 2011
| Michael O'Brien
Posted on 02/10/2011 6:25:57 AM PST by Notary Sojac
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360 ... 501-511 next last
To: Notary Sojac
“I’m against homosexuals marrying, serving in the military, indoctrinating our school children, or having any other special privileges, but other than that they have the same basic rights, not group rights, as any other citizen.”
___________________________________________
See, this is why you are a lib. You are inconsistent.
Lets discect: You don’t want homo’s indoctrinating our children. Any reasonable conservative understands that to mean that No Homosexuals are to be hired as teachers. Yet you go on to say that they should have the “same basic rights, not group rights, as any other citizen.”
I call your attention to my tagline. In case you haven’t seen it. It pisses off libs.
321
posted on
02/10/2011 12:07:05 PM PST
by
Responsibility2nd
(Yes, as a matter of fact, what you do in your bedroom IS my business.)
To: DJ MacWoW
DJ, still struggling with the technical issues, trying to read and catch up, but have to turn of comp (yet again in a minute. If you get a chance, could you tell me the dummies' version wether Sarah Palin is really "okay" with GOProud being included in conservatve get togethers? Which of course CPAC is not...
322
posted on
02/10/2011 12:08:40 PM PST
by
little jeremiah
(Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
To: HappyWarrior2012
I wasn’t talking about Sarah Palin. I was replying to your assertions about Libertarians.
Nothing to do with Palin whatsoever.
Your comment was about Libertarians, and my reply was about the LP platform.
EOM.
323
posted on
02/10/2011 12:10:03 PM PST
by
little jeremiah
(Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
To: lonestar; altura; DJ MacWoW; All
I believe any individual who has performed or received oral sex heterosexually should recuse themselves from the discussion. Sodomy is as sodomy does.
324
posted on
02/10/2011 12:14:39 PM PST
by
j.argese
(You may think you've won the day, in the end you will surely lose the important race.)
To: DJ MacWoW
OOps, only meant to italicize “yet again”. That’s what I get for not prevewing.
325
posted on
02/10/2011 12:15:23 PM PST
by
little jeremiah
(Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
To: Le Chien Rouge
GOProud wants tax and SS bennies for homo-partners.
They want same sex marriage.
They want homos in the military.
They want special grants to homo-owned businesses and renovations of “old towns” where homos are known to live.
They want the US to hassle countries that are “mean” to homos.
They don’t mention abortion.
They want to (whoop-de-doo) “hold the line” on spending. Big freakin’ deal. But they want monies for them and their fellow queers.
They aren’t conservative at all.
326
posted on
02/10/2011 12:20:28 PM PST
by
little jeremiah
(Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
To: MEGoody
CPAC is no longer conservative. If you want to be a cheering section for Dem liberals pretending to be conservatives in order to infiltrate and destroy that’s your choice. But I’d be careful being vocal about it.
327
posted on
02/10/2011 12:22:24 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
To: little jeremiah
Let me try to help you. Sarah Palin has never attended CPAC. She is not on their Board of Directors. She has no vested interest in CPAC.
Given that she’s declined all of their invitations, and is thereby totally unfamiliar with CPAC, why should she be concerned at all with the organization?
328
posted on
02/10/2011 12:23:26 PM PST
by
onyx
(If you truly support Sarah Palin and want to be on her busy ping list, let me know!)
To: little jeremiah
Her only comment that I can see is that she backs their freedom of speech at CPAC. She’s never been to CPAC. And it is run by liberals and muslim sympathizers.
329
posted on
02/10/2011 12:24:15 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
To: onyx
I’m just waiting to hear some clear statements from her about, for instance, the repeal of DADT.
I’m not against Sarah Palin at all. I just want to know more clearly her stand on a few things, most notably, her viewpoint on the various goals of the homosexual agenda.
I just get the feeling she is sort of tippy toeing around this issue.
330
posted on
02/10/2011 12:25:45 PM PST
by
little jeremiah
(Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
To: MEGoody
What does freedom of speech have to do with CPAC?
(hint: nothing.)
In case you don’t know, freedom of speech means the government cannot stop speech that they don’t like just ‘cause they don’t like it.
Freedom of speech has nothing to do with organizations allowing or disallowing groups to have their say.
331
posted on
02/10/2011 12:25:47 PM PST
by
little jeremiah
(Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
To: j.argese
... any individual who has performed or received oral sex heterosexually should recuse themselves from the discussion. Sodomy is as sodomy does.1. How do you plan to know who those might be?
2. Who put you in charge of the discussion?
3. I didn't know oral sex was sodomy.
To: j.argese
Do you have any idea what you are talking about? Let your fingers do the walking and get informed.
333
posted on
02/10/2011 12:28:16 PM PST
by
dforest
To: lonestar
334
posted on
02/10/2011 12:28:54 PM PST
by
dforest
Comment #335 Removed by Moderator
To: lonestar
There are various meanings of “sodomy”. Some people like to bring up the oral sex = sodomy argument in order to (supposedly) pull the rug out from under peoples’ feet so they can’t oppose the fag agenda.
336
posted on
02/10/2011 12:30:06 PM PST
by
little jeremiah
(Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
To: DJ MacWoW
337
posted on
02/10/2011 12:30:19 PM PST
by
little jeremiah
(Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
To: lonestar
1. I believe we could all agree upon the "Honor System"
2. I didn't claim to be in charge. Why are you putting me in charge? I merely made a suggestion.
3. If it's not sodomy, it's at least Gomorrahy.
338
posted on
02/10/2011 12:30:29 PM PST
by
j.argese
(You may think you've won the day, in the end you will surely lose the important race.)
To: DJ MacWoW
339
posted on
02/10/2011 12:30:48 PM PST
by
little jeremiah
(Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
To: little jeremiah
Nobody has asked her about DADT. She's a military mom and she loves our troops. Her history is clear regarding the homosexual agenda. She is against gay marriage and said in ‘08 that she supported a Constitutional Amendment for one man, one woman marriage.
I honestly don't know where this doubt is coming from. *Homosexuals are virulently opposed to her.
340
posted on
02/10/2011 12:30:58 PM PST
by
onyx
(If you truly support Sarah Palin and want to be on her busy ping list, let me know!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360 ... 501-511 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson